Literature DB >> 9165399

The role of backside polishing, cup angle, and polyethylene thickness on the contact stresses in metal-backed acetabular components.

S M Kurtz1, A A Edidin, D L Bartel.   

Abstract

Mechanical interactions between the polyethylene liner and the metal-backing play an important role in the load transfer and debris-generation mechanisms of an acetabular component. Insert thickness, cup orientation, and insert-shell interface conditions affect the resulting contact stresses at the articulating and backside surfaces of the polyethylene component. The objective of this study was to determine the variation in contact stresses on a hemispherical acetabular component as a function of the friction coefficient of the line-shell interface, the thickness of the insert, and the load application angle. Three-dimensional finite element models of a metal-backed acetabular component with liner thicknesses of 3-12 mm were developed. The insert-shell interface was modeled as either matte or highly polished, and the load angle of the joint reaction force was changed from 36 to 63 degrees with respect to the dome. We found that the contact stresses at the articulating and backside surfaces of the insert were relatively insensitive to changes in the coefficient of friction at the insert-shell interface (resulting in approximately 1-10% variation in contact stress), when compared to the effect of changing the insert's thickness (approximately 80% variation in contact stress) or changing the direction of the joint reaction force (approximately 20% variation in contact stress). The results of this study suggest that polishing the metal at the insert-shell interface does not substantially change the contact stresses at either surface of the component. Of the design variables available for selective modification by either the surgeon or the engineer, insert thickness and shell orientation play a greater role in determining the magnitude of the resulting contact stresses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9165399     DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9290(96)00181-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  7 in total

Review 1.  Is there evidence for accelerated polyethylene wear in uncemented compared to cemented acetabular components? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Hugo C van der Veen; Hans-Peter W van Jonbergen; Rudolf W Poolman; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Jos J A M van Raay
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Backside Wear Is Not Dependent on the Acetabular Socket Design in Crosslinked Polyethylene Liners.

Authors:  Kamal Bali; Richard W McCalden; Douglas D R Naudie; Steven J MacDonald; Matthew G Teeter
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Wear versus thickness and other features of 5-Mrad crosslinked UHMWPE acetabular liners.

Authors:  Fu-Wen Shen; Zhen Lu; Harry A McKellop
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  Current Concepts of Using Large Femoral Heads in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Myung-Rae Cho; Won Kee Choi; Jae Jung Kim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2016-09-30

5.  Analysis of the Risk of Wear on Cemented and Uncemented Polyethylene Liners According to Different Variables in Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Basilio De la Torre; Loreto Barrios; Juan De la Torre-Mosquera; Julia Bujan; Miguel A Ortega; Carlos González-Bravo
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-27       Impact factor: 3.623

6.  Experimental and analytical validation of a modular acetabular prosthesis in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Francisco Romero; Farid Amirouche; Luke Aram; Mark H Gonzalez
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2007-05-16       Impact factor: 2.359

7.  Contact mechanics of modular metal-on-polyethylene total hip replacement under adverse edge loading conditions.

Authors:  Xijin Hua; Junyan Li; Ling Wang; Zhongmin Jin; Ruth Wilcox; John Fisher
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.712

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.