Literature DB >> 9165321

Evaluation of the pattern of liver tests and yield of cholangiography in symptomatic choledocholithiasis: a prospective study.

A D Roston1, I M Jacobson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of ERCP in the management of choledocholithiasis in an era of minimally invasive therapy continues to be defined.
METHODS: We evaluated prospectively the pattern of liver test abnormalities and yield of cholangiography after presentation with illnesses suggesting choledocholithiasis. Ninety-four consecutive patients, all with liver test abnormalities (total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, AST, and ALT) at presentation, had serial determinations to within 24 hours of cholangiography and were divided into four groups based on their patterns of rise or fall of liver test results as well as presenting clinical syndrome. Group I: normalized liver tests; Group II: falling liver tests, and alkaline phosphatase falling greater than 50% of the difference between presentation value and upper limit of normal; Group III: alkaline phosphatase falling less than 50%; and Group IV: any liver test with increasing levels. Clinical syndromes included cholangitis, pancreatitis, combined cholangitis and pancreatitis, and biliary pain with abnormal liver tests.
RESULTS: Yields of choledocholithiasis were 13% (Group I), 50% (Group II), 67% (Group III), and 94% (Group IV). Yield by syndromes were 36% (biliary pancreatitis), 72% (biliary pain and abnormal liver tests), 87% (cholangitis), and 100% (cholangitis and pancreatitis).
CONCLUSION: The degree of decline in liver test levels is inversely related to the yield of cholangiography in symptomatic choledocholithiasis; the yield of ERCP in these patients (with normalized liver tests) is low and they do not require ERCP. Pre-ERCP estimates of the likelihood of choledocholithiasis can be made on the basis of the pattern of liver tests, and biliary pancreatitis patients with normalized liver tests do not require ERCP.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9165321     DOI: 10.1016/s0016-5107(97)70150-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  11 in total

Review 1.  Management of suspected stones in the common bile duct.

Authors:  Majid A Almadi; Jeffrey S Barkun; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-04-16       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Practical recommendations for the prediction and management of common bile duct stones in patients with gallstones.

Authors:  N A Kama; M Atli; M Doganay; M Kologlu; E Reis; M Dolapci
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound in patients at high risk of choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  George Dittrick; Jeffrey P Lamont; Joseph A Kuhn; Damien Mallat
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-07

Review 4.  Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography versus intraoperative cholangiography for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 5.  Endoscopic ultrasound versus magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Vanja Giljaca; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

Review 6.  Ultrasound versus liver function tests for diagnosis of common bile duct stones.

Authors:  Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy; Vanja Giljaca; Yemisi Takwoingi; David Higgie; Goran Poropat; Davor Štimac; Brian R Davidson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-02-26

7.  Selective management of patients with acute biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  Dana A Telem; Kimberly Bowman; John Hwang; Edward H Chin; Scott Q Nguyen; Celia M Divino
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 8.  Recurrent acute biliary pancreatitis: the protective role of cholecystectomy and endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  E J M van Geenen; D L van der Peet; C J J Mulder; M A Cuesta; M J Bruno
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction.

Authors:  Frances Tse; Jeffrey S Barkun; Joseph Romagnuolo; Gad Friedman; Jeffrey D Bornstein; Alan N Barkun
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.647

10.  The predictivity of serum biochemical markers in acute biliary pancreatitis.

Authors:  Bülent Güngör; Kasım Cağlayan; Cafer Polat; Deniz Seren; Kenan Erzurumlu; Zafer Malazgirt
Journal:  ISRN Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.