Literature DB >> 9161941

Intra- and interexaminer reliability of anthropometric measurements of term infants.

T S Johnson1, J L Engstrom, D K Gelhar.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reliability of anthropometric measurements of term infants has not been studied sufficiently to determine if these measurements are reliable enough to be used in clinical practice and research. This study described the intra- and interexaminer reliability of the following anthropometric measurements: weight (WT), head circumference (HC), chest circumference (CC), abdominal circumference (AC), mid-arm circumference (MAC), and length.
METHODS: A convenience sample of 50 clinically stable term infants was studied. Two examiners obtained the six measurements twice using blank tape measures. The order of examiners was randomized and the examiners were masked to their own and the other examiners' measurements.
RESULTS: The intraexaminer mean absolute differences were as follows: WT = 1.88, 3.28 g; HC = 0.29, 0.29 cm; CC = 0.50, 0.78 cm; AC = 0.71, 0.77 cm; MAC = 0.36, 0.39 cm; length = 0.92, 1.18 cm. The interexaminer mean absolute differences were as follows: WT = 1.94, 1.66 g; HC = 0.37, 0.36 cm; CC = 0.59, 0.72 cm; AC = 0.99, 0.77 cm; MAC = 0.41, 0.57 cm; length = 1.57, 1.47 cm.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that intraexaminer differences tended to be smaller than interexaminer differences for all measures except weight, which remained stable for intra- and interexaminer comparisons. These findings also suggest that weight and head circumference were the most reliable measures, whereas length and mid-arm circumference were the least reliable measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9161941     DOI: 10.1097/00005176-199705000-00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  30 in total

1.  Misdiagnosis of overweight and underweight children younger than 2 years of age due to length measurement bias.

Authors:  Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Janet W Rich-Edwards; Kelley S Scanlon; Ken P Kleinman; Matthew W Gillman
Journal:  MedGenMed       Date:  2005-11-29

2.  Size at birth and risk of breast cancer: update from a prospective population-based study.

Authors:  Marie Søfteland Sandvei; Pagona Lagiou; Pål Richard Romundstad; Dimitrios Trichopoulos; Lars Johan Vatten
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-05-31       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Longitudinal changes in maternal anthropometry in relation to neonatal anthropometry.

Authors:  Sarah J Pugh; Ana M Ortega-Villa; William Grobman; Stefanie N Hinkle; Roger B Newman; Mary Hediger; Jagteshwar Grewal; Deborah A Wing; Paul S Albert; Katherine L Grantz
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 4.022

4.  Endocrine disruptors and neonatal anthropometry, NICHD Fetal Growth Studies - Singletons.

Authors:  Germaine M Buck Louis; Shuyan Zhai; Melissa M Smarr; Jagteshwar Grewal; Cuilin Zhang; Katherine L Grantz; Stefanie N Hinkle; Rajeshwari Sundaram; Sunmi Lee; Masato Honda; JungKeun Oh; Kurunthachalam Kannan
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Early growth faltering in healthy term infants predicts longitudinal growth.

Authors:  Erin S Ross; Nancy F Krebs; A Laurie W Shroyer; L Miriam Dickinson; Paul H Barrett; Susan L Johnson
Journal:  Early Hum Dev       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Use of a body proportionality index for growth assessment of preterm infants.

Authors:  Irene E Olsen; M Louise Lawson; Jareen Meinzen-Derr; Amy L Sapsford; Kurt R Schibler; Edward F Donovan; Ardythe L Morrow
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 4.406

7.  Standardization of Research-Quality Anthropometric Measurement of Infants and Implementation in a Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Christine Coburn-Miller; Susan Casey; Quynh Luong; Natalia Cameron; Jasna Hocevar-Trnka; Daniel H Leung; Daniel Gelfond; James E Heubi; Bonnie Ramsey; Drucy Borowitz
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 4.689

8.  Anthropometric measurement standardization in the US-affiliated pacific: Report from the Children's Healthy Living Program.

Authors:  Fenfang Li; Lynne R Wilkens; Rachel Novotny; Marie K Fialkowski; Yvette C Paulino; Randall Nelson; Andrea Bersamin; Ursula Martin; Jonathan Deenik; Carol J Boushey
Journal:  Am J Hum Biol       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 1.937

9.  Characterization of Thermal and Mechanical Indices from Serial Ultrasound Exams and Associations with Neonatal Anthropometry: The NICHD Fetal Growth Studies.

Authors:  Melissa M Smarr; Germaine M Buck Louis; Paul S Albert; Sungduk Kim; Karin M Fuchs; Jagteshwar Grewal; Mary E D'Alton; Katherine L Grantz
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2017-11-30       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Estimating gestational age at birth from fundal height and additional anthropometrics: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  S J Pugh; A M Ortega-Villa; W Grobman; R B Newman; J Owen; D A Wing; P S Albert; K L Grantz
Journal:  BJOG       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 6.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.