OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of weight-for-length (defined as gm/cm(3), known as the "ponderal index") as a complementary measure of growth in infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of infants (n=1214) of gestational age 26 to 29 weeks at birth, included in a registry database (1991-2003), who had growth data at birth and discharge. Weight-for-age and weight-for-length were categorized as small (<10th percentile), appropriate, or large (>90th percentile). RESULTS: Statistical agreement between the weight-for-age and weight-for-length measures was poor (kappa=0.02 at birth, 0.10 at discharge; Bowker test for symmetry, P< .0001). From birth to discharge, the percentage of small-for-age infants increased from 12% to 21%, the percentage of small-for-length infants decreased from 10% to 4%, the percentage of large-for-age infants remained similar (<1%), and the percentage of large-for-length infants increased from 5% to 17%. At discharge, 92% of the small-for-age infants were appropriate or large-for-length, and 19% of the appropriate-for-age infants were large-for-length. CONCLUSIONS: Weight-for-age and weight-for-length are complementary measures. Weight-for-length or other measures of body proportionality should be considered for inclusion in routine growth monitoring of infants in the NICU.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the utility of weight-for-length (defined as gm/cm(3), known as the "ponderal index") as a complementary measure of growth in infants in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). STUDY DESIGN: This was a secondary analysis of infants (n=1214) of gestational age 26 to 29 weeks at birth, included in a registry database (1991-2003), who had growth data at birth and discharge. Weight-for-age and weight-for-length were categorized as small (<10th percentile), appropriate, or large (>90th percentile). RESULTS: Statistical agreement between the weight-for-age and weight-for-length measures was poor (kappa=0.02 at birth, 0.10 at discharge; Bowker test for symmetry, P< .0001). From birth to discharge, the percentage of small-for-age infants increased from 12% to 21%, the percentage of small-for-length infants decreased from 10% to 4%, the percentage of large-for-age infants remained similar (<1%), and the percentage of large-for-length infants increased from 5% to 17%. At discharge, 92% of the small-for-age infants were appropriate or large-for-length, and 19% of the appropriate-for-age infants were large-for-length. CONCLUSIONS: Weight-for-age and weight-for-length are complementary measures. Weight-for-length or other measures of body proportionality should be considered for inclusion in routine growth monitoring of infants in the NICU.
Authors: B R Vohr; L L Wright; A M Dusick; L Mele; J Verter; J J Steichen; N P Simon; D C Wilson; S Broyles; C R Bauer; V Delaney-Black; K A Yolton; B E Fleisher; L A Papile; M D Kaplan Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2000-06 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Maureen Hack; Daniel J Flannery; Mark Schluchter; Lydia Cartar; Elaine Borawski; Nancy Klein Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2002-01-17 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: J A Lemons; C R Bauer; W Oh; S B Korones; L A Papile; B J Stoll; J Verter; M Temprosa; L L Wright; R A Ehrenkranz; A A Fanaroff; A Stark; W Carlo; J E Tyson; E F Donovan; S Shankaran; D K Stevenson Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2001-01 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Irene E Olsen; Douglas K Richardson; Christopher H Schmid; Lynne M Ausman; Johanna T Dwyer Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-12 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Ipsita Goswami; Niels Rochow; Gerhard Fusch; Kai Liu; Michael L Marrin; Matthias Heckmann; Mathias Nelle; Christoph Fusch Journal: Nutrients Date: 2016-07-08 Impact factor: 5.717
Authors: Valentina Chiavaroli; Wayne S Cutfield; José G B Derraik; Zengxiang Pan; Sherry Ngo; Allan Sheppard; Susan Craigie; Peter Stone; Lynn Sadler; Fredrik Ahlsson Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-09-30 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Christopher S Ambrose; Evan J Anderson; Eric A F Simões; Xionghua Wu; Hanaa Elhefni; C Lucy Park; Frangiscos Sifakis; Jessie R Groothuis Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 2.129