Literature DB >> 9159479

Empirical free energy calculations: a blind test and further improvements to the method.

J Novotny1, R E Bruccoleri, M Davis, K A Sharp.   

Abstract

Empirical Gibbs functions estimate free energies of non-covalent reactions (deltaG) from atomic coordinates of reaction products (e.g. antibody-antigen complexes). The function previously developed by us has four terms that quantify the effects of hydrophobic, electrostatic and entropy changes (conformational, association) upon complexation. The function was used to calculate delta deltaG of ten lysozyme mutants affecting the stability of the HyHEL-10 antibody-lysozyme complex. The mutants were computer-modeled from the X-ray structure of the wild-type, and free energy calculations produced a correlation coefficient of 0.5 with the experimental delta deltaG data (average absolute error +/-3 kcal). The following changes were then introduced into the Gibbs function: (1) the hydrophobic force was made proportional to the molecular surface, as calculated by the GEPOL93 algorithm, with the scaling constant of 70 cal/mol/A2; (2) calculation of the electrostatics of binding was carried out by the finite difference Poisson-Boltzmann algorithm, which employed uniform grid charging, dielectric boundary smoothing and charge anti-aliasing; and (3) side-chain conformational entropy was estimated from the CONGEN sampling of torsional degrees of freedom. In the new calculations, correlation with experimental data improved to 0.6 or 0.8 if a single outlying mutant, K96M, was neglected. Analysis of the errors remaining in our calculations indicated that molecular mechanics-based modeling of the mutants, rather than the form of our amended Gibbs function, was the main factor limiting the accuracy of the free energy estimates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9159479     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0961

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  16 in total

1.  Molecular dynamics and free-energy calculations applied to affinity maturation in antibody 48G7.

Authors:  L T Chong; Y Duan; L Wang; I Massova; P A Kollman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-12-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Optimization of binding electrostatics: charge complementarity in the barnase-barstar protein complex.

Authors:  L P Lee; B Tidor
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Free energy decomposition of protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  S Y Noskov; C Lim
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Calculations of free-energy contributions to protein-RNA complex stabilization.

Authors:  M A Olson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Modeling the structure of agitoxin in complex with the Shaker K+ channel: a computational approach based on experimental distance restraints extracted from thermodynamic mutant cycles.

Authors:  Mats A L Eriksson; Benoît Roux
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Structure-based thermodynamic analysis of the dissociation of protein phosphatase-1 catalytic subunit and microcystin-LR docked complexes.

Authors:  P Lavigne; J R Bagu; R Boyko; L Willard; C F Holmes; B D Sykes
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  iMOT: an interactive package for the selection of spatially interacting motifs.

Authors:  A Bhaduri; G Pugalenthi; N Gupta; R Sowdhamini
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Structural determinants of trypsin affinity and specificity for cationic inhibitors.

Authors:  F Polticelli; P Ascenzi; M Bolognesi; B Honig
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Affinity and specificity of protein U1A-RNA complex formation based on an additive component free energy model.

Authors:  Bethany L Kormos; Yulia Benitex; Anne M Baranger; David L Beveridge
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-06-09       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Calmodulin Gates Aquaporin 0 Permeability through a Positively Charged Cytoplasmic Loop.

Authors:  James B Fields; Karin L Németh-Cahalan; J Alfredo Freites; Irene Vorontsova; James E Hall; Douglas J Tobias
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 5.157

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.