Literature DB >> 10588705

Molecular dynamics and free-energy calculations applied to affinity maturation in antibody 48G7.

L T Chong1, Y Duan, L Wang, I Massova, P A Kollman.   

Abstract

We investigated the relative free energies of hapten binding to the germ line and mature forms of the 48G7 antibody Fab fragments by applying a continuum model to structures sampled from molecular dynamics simulations in explicit solvent. Reasonable absolute and very good relative free energies were obtained. As a result of nine somatic mutations that do not contact the hapten, the affinity-matured antibody binds the hapten >10(4) tighter than the germ line antibody. Energetic analysis reveals that van der Waals interactions and nonpolar contributions to solvation are similar and drive the formations of both the germ line and mature antibody-hapten complexes. Affinity maturation of the 48G7 antibody therefore appears to occur through reorganization of the combining site geometry in a manner that optimizes the balance of gaining favorable electrostatic interactions with the hapten and losing those with solvent during the binding process. As reflected by lower rms fluctuations in the antibody-hapten complex, the mature complex undergoes more restricted fluctuations than the germ line complex. The dramatically increased affinity of the 48G7 antibody over its germ line precursor is thus made possible by electrostatic optimization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10588705      PMCID: PMC24436          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.96.25.14330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  19 in total

1.  What determines the van der Waals coefficient beta in the LIE (linear interaction energy) method to estimate binding free energies using molecular dynamics simulations?

Authors:  W Wang; J Wang; P A Kollman
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999-02-15

Review 2.  Electrostatic fields in antibodies and antibody/antigen complexes.

Authors:  J Novotny; K Sharp
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 3.  Electrostatic interactions in macromolecules: theory and applications.

Authors:  K A Sharp; B Honig
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem       Date:  1990

Review 4.  Cell selection by antigen in the immune response.

Authors:  G W Siskind; B Benacerraf
Journal:  Adv Immunol       Date:  1969       Impact factor: 3.543

5.  Antibody diversity: somatic hypermutation of rearranged VH genes.

Authors:  S Kim; M Davis; E Sinn; P Patten; L Hood
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Calculation of electrostatic potentials in an enzyme active site.

Authors:  M K Gilson; B H Honig
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1987 Nov 5-11       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  A new method for predicting binding affinity in computer-aided drug design.

Authors:  J Aqvist; C Medina; J E Samuelsson
Journal:  Protein Eng       Date:  1994-03

8.  The immunological evolution of catalysis.

Authors:  P A Patten; N S Gray; P L Yang; C B Marks; G J Wedemayer; J J Boniface; R C Stevens; P G Schultz
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-02-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Salt effects on protein-DNA interactions. The lambda cI repressor and EcoRI endonuclease.

Authors:  V K Misra; J L Hecht; K A Sharp; R A Friedman; B Honig
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-04-29       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Salt effects on ligand-DNA binding. Minor groove binding antibiotics.

Authors:  V K Misra; K A Sharp; R A Friedman; B Honig
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1994-04-29       Impact factor: 5.469

View more
  57 in total

1.  Molecular dynamics studies of the HIV-1 TAR and its complex with argininamide.

Authors:  R Nifosì; C M Reyes; P A Kollman
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-12-15       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Does a diol cyclic urea inhibitor of HIV-1 protease bind tighter than its corresponding alcohol form? A study by free energy perturbation and continuum electrostatics calculations.

Authors:  L Wang; Y Duan; P Stouten; G V De Lucca; R M Klabe; P A Kollman
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.686

3.  Molecular dynamics study of the energetic, mechanistic, and structural implications of a closed phosphate tube in ncd.

Authors:  T J Minehardt; R Cooke; E Pate; P A Kollman
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  Computational study of protein specificity: the molecular basis of HIV-1 protease drug resistance.

Authors:  W Wang; P A Kollman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-12-18       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Can molecular dynamics simulations assist in design of specific inhibitors and imaging agents of amyloid aggregation? Structure, stability and free energy predictions for amyloid oligomers of VQIVYK, MVGGVV and LYQLEN.

Authors:  Workalemahu Mikre Berhanu; Artëm E Masunov
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-12-21       Impact factor: 1.810

6.  Directed evolution methods for overcoming trade-offs between protein activity and stability.

Authors:  Samuel D Stimple; Matthew D Smith; Peter M Tessier
Journal:  AIChE J       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 3.993

7.  Context-dependent mutations predominate in an engineered high-affinity single chain antibody fragment.

Authors:  Katarina S Midelfort; K Dane Wittrup
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 6.725

8.  Thermodynamic basis for promiscuity and selectivity in protein-protein interactions: PDZ domains, a case study.

Authors:  Nathalie Basdevant; Harel Weinstein; Marco Ceruso
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 15.419

9.  Comparison between Generalized-Born and Poisson-Boltzmann methods in physics-based scoring functions for protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Matthew C Lee; Rong Yang; Yong Duan
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2005-08-12       Impact factor: 1.810

10.  Molecular dynamics simulations of galectin-1-oligosaccharide complexes reveal the molecular basis for ligand diversity.

Authors:  Michael G Ford; Thomas Weimar; Thies Köhli; Robert J Woods
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2003-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.