M Sugiyama1, H Hagi, Y Atomi, M Saito. 1. First Department of Surgery, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography for detecting pancreatobiliary carcinoma and assessing portal venous invasion by carcinoma. METHODS: Seventy-three patients with pancreatic carcinoma (54 patients) or bile duct carcinoma (19 patients) underwent endoscopic ultrasonography, transabdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and angiography. All patients underwent tumor resection and histological examination for portal venous invasion. Results of endoscopic ultrasonography were compared with those of other imaging modalities. RESULTS: Histopathology revealed portal venous invasion in 20 patients. Endoscopic ultrasonography was significantly more sensitive (96%) than ultrasonography (81%), CT (86%), and angiography (59%) in detecting carcinomas. On endoscopic ultrasonography, loss of the echogenic vessel-parenchymal sonographic interface or a tumor within the vessel lumen indicated portal venous invasion. For diagnosing portal venous invasion, endoscopic ultrasonography was more sensitive (95%) and accurate (93%) than ultrasonography (55% and 67%), CT (65% and 74%), and angiography (75% and 79%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ultrasonography is the most accurate tool for detecting pancreatobiliary carcinomas and assessing portal venous invasion.
BACKGROUND: We evaluated the usefulness of endoscopic ultrasonography for detecting pancreatobiliary carcinoma and assessing portal venous invasion by carcinoma. METHODS: Seventy-three patients with pancreatic carcinoma (54 patients) or bile duct carcinoma (19 patients) underwent endoscopic ultrasonography, transabdominal ultrasonography, computed tomography (CT), and angiography. All patients underwent tumor resection and histological examination for portal venous invasion. Results of endoscopic ultrasonography were compared with those of other imaging modalities. RESULTS: Histopathology revealed portal venous invasion in 20 patients. Endoscopic ultrasonography was significantly more sensitive (96%) than ultrasonography (81%), CT (86%), and angiography (59%) in detecting carcinomas. On endoscopic ultrasonography, loss of the echogenic vessel-parenchymal sonographic interface or a tumor within the vessel lumen indicated portal venous invasion. For diagnosing portal venous invasion, endoscopic ultrasonography was more sensitive (95%) and accurate (93%) than ultrasonography (55% and 67%), CT (65% and 74%), and angiography (75% and 79%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Endoscopic ultrasonography is the most accurate tool for detecting pancreatobiliary carcinomas and assessing portal venous invasion.
Authors: Leticia Perondi Luz; Mohammad Ali Al-Haddad; Michael Sai Lai Sey; John M DeWitt Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2014-06-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Brooks D Lindsey; Jinwook Kim; Paul A Dayton; Xiaoning Jiang Journal: IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control Date: 2017-05-08 Impact factor: 2.725
Authors: Nicolas C Buchs; Michael Chilcott; Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Leo H Buhler; Philippe Morel Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-02-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Frances Tse; Jeffrey S Barkun; Joseph Romagnuolo; Gad Friedman; Jeffrey D Bornstein; Alan N Barkun Journal: HPB (Oxford) Date: 2006 Impact factor: 3.647