Literature DB >> 9157358

[Contact surface and pressure load at implant-bone interface in press-fit cups compared to natural hip joints].

K H Widmer1, B Zurfluh, E W Morscher.   

Abstract

The implantation of an endoprosthetic socket into the acetabulum alters the mechanical stresses in the periacetabular region in a significant manner compared with the natural hip joint. In this way, a remodelling process is initiated. Primary stability to achieve osseointegration and a loading of the acetabulum owing to the biomechanical interaction between cup and bone that is similar to the natural joint, are important prerequisites for a long-term bony integration of the implant. Therefore, the intra-articular pressure distribution in eight hip joints of fresh-frozen human pelvic cadavers and in the bone/implant interface of two press-fit cups was investigated using pressure-sensitive Prescale films. A modular cup with a pure hemispherical shape (PCA cup) and a monoblock cup with a biradial surface and flattening of the pole (press-fit cup) were tested. Loads of up to twice body weight were introduced into the sacrum, simulating a single-leg stance with the hip in neutral flexion. The results were extracted from the pressure prints applying digital image processing methods. It was demonstrated that intra-articular contact occurs over the whole articular surface of the joint, with contact areas between 39.0% and 56.9% of the hemisphere, showing zones of higher pressures where the acetabulum is supported by the iliac, ischial and pubic bone. The biradial press-fit cup showed mean contact areas of 44.7% of its surface when inserted under press-fit only. This area was enlarged to 53.0% and to 64.2% with increasing load. The corresponding figures for the PCA cup are 45.1%, 48.9% and 57.1%. The low-profile PCA cup produces a small band of high pressure near the periphery, and with increasing load its pole area comes into contact with the acetabular fossa. Occasionally, irregular gaps do occur. The press-fit cup enlarges the contact area from the periphery to the pole within its optimised biradial contact zone until the lunar surface is loaded. The acetabular fossa remains unloaded owing to the flattening of the pole. This load distribution is close to that of the natural hip joint. The pressure distribution of both cups is also characterised by three zones at the iliac, ischial and pubic bones showing a higher load transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9157358     DOI: 10.1007/s001320050084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  6 in total

1.  [Periprosthetic bone loss after total hip endoprosthesis. Dependence on the type of prosthesis and preoperative bone configuration].

Authors:  A Roth; G Richartz; K Sander; A Sachse; R Fuhrmann; A Wagner; R-A Venbrocks
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 2.  Containment versus impingement: finding a compromise for cup placement in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  K-H Widmer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Influence of acetabular cup design on the primary implant stability : an experimental and numerical analysis].

Authors:  C Zietz; A Fritsche; D Kluess; W Mittelmeier; R Bader
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  The distribution of cartilage thickness within the joints of the lower limb of elderly individuals.

Authors:  C Adam; F Eckstein; S Milz; R Putz
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 5.  [Uncemented arthroplasty of the hip].

Authors:  C von Schulze Pellengahr; A Fottner; S Utzschneider; M Schmitt-Sody; W Teske; T Lichtinger; S A Esenwein
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 1.087

6.  3D video-based deformation measurement of the pelvis bone under dynamic cyclic loading.

Authors:  Beat Göpfert; Zdzislaw Krol; Marie Freslier; Andreas H Krieg
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-07-17       Impact factor: 2.819

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.