Literature DB >> 9156226

Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity for individual Sloan letters.

K R Alexander1, W Xie, D J Derlacki.   

Abstract

Sloan letter optotypes are used frequently to evaluate visual impairment, and scoring procedures have been developed that are based on the numbers of letters that are identified correctly. However, previous studies have presented conflicting evidence regarding the relative identifiability of the individual Sloan letters. To investigate this issue further, we measured psychometric functions for the identification of each of the 10 Sloan letters, with individual letters presented in random order on the gray-scale display of a Macintosh computer-based testing system. Data were obtained from three visually normal subjects under each of three conditions: (1) as a function of log contrast at a relatively large letter size; (2) as a function of log contrast at a letter size near the acuity limit; and (3) as a function of log MAR (minimum angle of resolution) at maximum letter contrast. Estimates of threshold log contrast and threshold log MAR were derived from best-fitting Weibull functions. Threshold log contrast for small letters showed the greatest interletter variability. There was relatively little interletter variability in either threshold log contrast for large letters or threshold log MAR for high-contrast letters. However, due to the relatively steep psychometric functions under these latter two conditions, the different Sloan letters had considerably different percent correct values near threshold. The overall pattern of results suggests that the contrast sensitivity functions for individual Sloan letters are displaced laterally along a log MAR axis, while their vertical positions are essentially equivalent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9156226     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(96)00190-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  11 in total

1.  Individual Letter Contrast Thresholds: Effect of Object Frequency and Noise.

Authors:  Cierra Hall; Shu Wang; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  Visual impact of Zernike and Seidel forms of monochromatic aberrations.

Authors:  Xu Cheng; Arthur Bradley; Sowmya Ravikumar; Larry N Thibos
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Adult discrimination performance for pediatric acuity test optotypes.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Sylvia R Mishoulam; Robert M Nosofsky; Velma Dobson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Determinants of contrast sensitivity for the tumbling E and Landolt C.

Authors:  Kenneth R Alexander; J Jason McAnany
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  Spatial frequencies used in Landolt C orientation judgments: relation to inferred magnocellular and parvocellular pathways.

Authors:  J Jason McAnany; Kenneth R Alexander
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-04-18       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Binocular contrast summation and inhibition depends on spatial frequency, eccentricity and binocular disparity.

Authors:  Concetta F Alberti; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2018-09-16       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Application of Correlation-Based Scoring Scheme for Visual Acuity Measurements in the Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Csilla Fülep; Illés Kovács; Kinga Kránitz; Zoltán Zsolt Nagy; Gábor Erdei
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 3.283

8.  Comparing Spatial Contrast Sensitivity Functions Measured With Digit and Grating Stimuli.

Authors:  Haiyan Zheng; Menglu Shen; Xianghang He; Rong Cui; Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Fang Hou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.283

9.  Measuring Visual Function Using the MultiQuity System: Comparison with an Established Device.

Authors:  Patrycja Smolarek-Kasprzak; John M Nolan; Stephen Beatty; Jessica Dennison; Kwadwo Owusu Akuffo; Robert Kuchling; Jim Stack; Graham O'Regan
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 1.909

10.  Do picture-based charts overestimate visual acuity? Comparison of Kay Pictures, Lea Symbols, HOTV and Keeler logMAR charts with Sloan letters in adults and children.

Authors:  Nicola S Anstice; Robert J Jacobs; Samantha K Simkin; Melissa Thomson; Benjamin Thompson; Andrew V Collins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.