P F Allen1, A S McMillan, D G Smith. 1. Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Newcastle, Newcastle upon Tyne.
Abstract
AIM: To assess the nature, timing and frequency of complications associated with implant therapy and to assess maintenance requirements of implant-supported prostheses. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: The Dental Hospital in Newcastle upon Tyne. METHOD: Dental records of 60 patients provided with implant-supported prostheses were examined. Data were compiled on the number of fixtures placed per patient, the type of prosthesis provided, complications during the surgical and prosthodontic phases, and peri-implant soft tissue complications. RESULTS: 66 prostheses were placed on 236 fixtures over a 6-year period. Surgical complications included fixture loss (n = 6), dysaesthesia (n = 12), and the need for a guided tissue regeneration procedure (n = 10). Common maintenance requirements were tightening of components (n = 11), clip replacement (n = 7) and repair of conventional prostheses opposing implant supported prostheses (n = 7). Plaque control was unsatisfactory with almost half of the subjects requiring intensive oral hygiene instruction and scaling at the first post placement review. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthodontic maintenance requirements were high, particularly during the first year. Surgical complications were relatively infrequent. A case was made for a rigorous oral hygiene programme to reduce the potential for fixture loss through neglect. The financial cost associated with the maintenance of implant-supported prostheses should be incorporated in their overall funding.
AIM: To assess the nature, timing and frequency of complications associated with implant therapy and to assess maintenance requirements of implant-supported prostheses. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: The Dental Hospital in Newcastle upon Tyne. METHOD: Dental records of 60 patients provided with implant-supported prostheses were examined. Data were compiled on the number of fixtures placed per patient, the type of prosthesis provided, complications during the surgical and prosthodontic phases, and peri-implant soft tissue complications. RESULTS: 66 prostheses were placed on 236 fixtures over a 6-year period. Surgical complications included fixture loss (n = 6), dysaesthesia (n = 12), and the need for a guided tissue regeneration procedure (n = 10). Common maintenance requirements were tightening of components (n = 11), clip replacement (n = 7) and repair of conventional prostheses opposing implant supported prostheses (n = 7). Plaque control was unsatisfactory with almost half of the subjects requiring intensive oral hygiene instruction and scaling at the first post placement review. CONCLUSIONS: Prosthodontic maintenance requirements were high, particularly during the first year. Surgical complications were relatively infrequent. A case was made for a rigorous oral hygiene programme to reduce the potential for fixture loss through neglect. The financial cost associated with the maintenance of implant-supported prostheses should be incorporated in their overall funding.