Literature DB >> 9153315

DNA binding and phasing analyses of Tn5 transposase and a monomeric variant.

D York1, W S Reznikoff.   

Abstract

Both full-length Tn 5 transposase and a COOH-terminal truncated monomeric form of the protein,n369, have been shown to specifically bind end sequences at comparable affinities. In addition, both proteins distort the target sequence in a similar manner, as determined by a circular permutation assay. In this study,nEK54, a derivative ofn369 with a single amino acid substitution that significantly enhances binding activity, is used in further binding and bending studies along with full-length transposase. Phasing analysis has shown that distortion of the end sequences upon binding of full-length transposase and nEK54 protein is due in part to a protein-induced bend oriented towards the major groove. Because the center of transposase-induced bending maps to the extreme leftward end of the 19 bp consensus sequence, we examined the possibility that optimal protein binding requires additional upstream nucleotide contacts. Experiments presented here show that 9-10 nucleotides are needed upstream of +1 of the 19 bp sequence for efficient binding and this requirement can be met by either single-stranded or double-stranded DNA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9153315      PMCID: PMC146724          DOI: 10.1093/nar/25.11.2153

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res        ISSN: 0305-1048            Impact factor:   16.971


  35 in total

1.  Purification and biochemical analyses of a monomeric form of Tn5 transposase.

Authors:  D York; W S Reznikoff
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1996-10-01       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Complete nucleotide sequence of the Escherichia coli plasmid pBR322.

Authors:  J G Sutcliffe
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1979

3.  Role of the IS50 R proteins in the promotion and control of Tn5 transposition.

Authors:  R C Johnson; W S Reznikoff
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1984-08-25       Impact factor: 5.469

4.  The functional differences in the inverted repeats of Tn5 are caused by a single base pair nonhomology.

Authors:  S J Rothstein; W S Reznikoff
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Regulation of Tn5 by the right-repeat proteins: control at the level of the transposition reaction?

Authors:  R R Isberg; A L Lazaar; M Syvanen
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Control of Tn5 transposition in Escherichia coli is mediated by protein from the right repeat.

Authors:  R C Johnson; J C Yin; W S Reznikoff
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Inverted repeats of Tn5 are transposable elements.

Authors:  D E Berg; L Johnsrud; L McDivitt; R Ramabhadran; B J Hirschel
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Sequences essential for transposition at the termini of IS50.

Authors:  C Sasakawa; G F Carle; D E Berg
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Construction and characterization of new cloning vehicles. II. A multipurpose cloning system.

Authors:  F Bolivar; R L Rodriguez; P J Greene; M C Betlach; H L Heyneker; H W Boyer; J H Crosa; S Falkow
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1977       Impact factor: 3.688

10.  DNA sequences at the ends of transposon Tn5 required for transposition.

Authors:  R C Johnson; W S Reznikoff
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1983 Jul 21-27       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  10 in total

1.  Determinants for hairpin formation in Tn10 transposition.

Authors:  J S Allingham; S J Wardle; D B Haniford
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Tn5 synaptic complex formation: role of transposase residue W450.

Authors:  Richard J Gradman; William S Reznikoff
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 3.490

3.  Factors affecting transposition of the Himar1 mariner transposon in vitro.

Authors:  D J Lampe; T E Grant; H M Robertson
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Determinants of the position of a Flp-induced DNA bend.

Authors:  K H Luetke; P D Sadowski
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-03-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  piggyBac can bypass DNA synthesis during cut and paste transposition.

Authors:  Rupak Mitra; Jennifer Fain-Thornton; Nancy L Craig
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 11.598

6.  Defining characteristics of Tn5 Transposase non-specific DNA binding.

Authors:  Mindy Steiniger; Christian D Adams; John F Marko; William S Reznikoff
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2006-05-22       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  The global bacterial regulator H-NS promotes transpososome formation and transposition in the Tn5 system.

Authors:  Crystal R Whitfield; Simon J Wardle; David B Haniford
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  Base-flipping dynamics in a DNA hairpin processing reaction.

Authors:  Julien Bischerour; Ronald Chalmers
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2007-04-04       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  A bifunctional DNA binding region in Tn5 transposase.

Authors:  Richard J Gradman; Jerod L Ptacin; Archna Bhasin; William S Reznikoff; Igor Y Goryshin
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-14       Impact factor: 3.501

10.  A Novel Next-Generation Sequencing and Analysis Platform to Assess the Identity of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Preparations from Viral DNA Extracts.

Authors:  Karen Guerin; Meghan Rego; Daniela Bourges; Ina Ersing; Leila Haery; Kate Harten DeMaio; Erin Sanders; Meron Tasissa; Maya Kostman; Michelle Tillgren; Luke Makana Hanley; Isabelle Mueller; Alanna Mitsopoulos; Melina Fan
Journal:  Hum Gene Ther       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 5.695

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.