Literature DB >> 9152315

Carotid endarterectomy for recurrent stenosis.

M A Mansour1, S S Kang, W H Baker, W C Watson, F N Littooy, N Labropoulos, H P Greisler.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to report our results in the surgical management of recurrent carotid stenosis (RCS) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
METHODS: In a 20-year period, we performed 1209 CEAs; 82 operations (6.8%) were for RCS. There were 33 men and 36 women, with an average age of 66.3 years. Nine patients underwent two redo CEAs and two patients underwent three redo CEAs for either bilateral recurrence or a second recurrence on the same side. Overall, 10 patients were identified with a second recurrence.
RESULTS: The average time to presentation with RCS was 65 months (range, 3 to 361 months). The majority of patients (66%) were symptomatic, 34% had transient ischemic attacks, 17% had amaurosis fugax, 9% had strokes, and 6% had nonhemispheric symptoms. Before repair, angiograms were obtained. Patch repair was performed in 61 procedures (74%), 41 with vein, 11 with Dacron, and nine with polytetrafluoroethylene. Autogenous or synthetic bypass grafts were used in 20 procedures (24%), vein in eight, Dacron in two, and polytetrafluoroethylene in 10. In one patient, an occluded internal carotid artery was ligated and an endarterectomy of the external carotid artery was performed without a patch. The operative stroke rate was 4.8%. Minor complications included transient or permanent cranial nerve deficits in 7.3% and wound hematomas in 2.4%.
CONCLUSION: Although repeat endarterectomy to treat RCS is technically more demanding, it can be performed safely. Long-term follow-up examination shows that a second recurrence may develop, and we recommend serial noninvasive testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9152315     DOI: 10.1016/s0741-5214(97)70217-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  3 in total

Review 1.  Carotid angioplasty and stenting. Will they match the gold standard?

Authors:  E B Diethrich
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1998

Review 2.  Carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zhenjie Liu; Zhenyu Shi; Yuqi Wang; Bin Chen; Ting Zhu; Yi Si; Weiguo Fu
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 3.  The management of carotid restenosis: a comprehensive review.

Authors:  Francesco Stilo; Nunzio Montelione; Rosalinda Calandrelli; Marisa Distefano; Francesco Spinelli; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro; Fabio Pilato
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-10
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.