Literature DB >> 9152181

Pouch salvage. Long-term outcome.

O A Ogunbiyi1, S Korsgen, M R Keighley.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the outcome of pouch salvage operations and the factors that may influence successful reconstructions.
METHODS: This retrospective review includes data from 198 patients who had undergone restorative proctocolectomy at a single institution during an 11-year period. All patients who had undergone attempted pouch salvage and who still had a pouch in situ were reviewed by both postal questionnaire and at interview in the outpatients clinic.
RESULTS: Of 198 patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis, 27 (13.6 percent) presented with pouch-specific complications requiring pouch salvage. A further five patients requiring pouch salvage were referred from other centers. Of 32 patients who underwent attempted pouch salvage, 16 (50 percent) had a successful outcome, 12 (37.5 percent) had pouch excision, and 3 (9 percent) are still defunctioned. There was one death (3 percent) in this series. Pelvic sepsis was a major cause of pouch failure, being present in 50 percent (8/16) of failed salvage procedures, and accounting for 58 percent (7/12) of pouch excisions.
CONCLUSIONS: Salvage surgery for major complications following ileoanal pouch construction is worthwhile in the absence of major pelvic sepsis. Overall success rate is 50 percent, and these results may be acceptable to highly motivated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9152181     DOI: 10.1007/bf02055376

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  13 in total

1.  Reconstruction for chronic dysfunction of ileoanal pouches.

Authors:  E W Fonkalsrud; J Bustorff-Silva
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  Restorative proctocolectomy: the current ochsner experience.

Authors:  Shahrazad Talebinejad; Terry C Hicks; David A Margolin; Charles B Whitlow; H David Vargas; David E Beck
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2013

3.  Ileal pouch salvage following failed ileal pouch- anal anastomosis.

Authors:  S S Saltzberg; C DiEdwardo; T E Scott; W W LaMorte; A F Stucchi; J M Becker
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  1999 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Neutrophil-related immunoinflammatory disturbance in steroid-overdosed ulcerative colitis patients.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Yoshiyama; Chikao Miki; Yoshiki Okita; Toshimitsu Araki; Keiichi Uchida; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-10-29       Impact factor: 7.527

5.  Reoperative inflammatory bowel disease surgery.

Authors:  Rowena L Ramirez; Phillip Fleshner
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2006-11

6.  Repeat ileal pouch-anal anastomosis to salvage septic complications of pelvic pouches: clinical outcome and quality of life assessment.

Authors:  V W Fazio; J S Wu; I C Lavery
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Robotic-assisted laparoscopic "salvage" rectopexy for recurrent ileoanal J-pouch prolapse.

Authors:  Madhu Ragupathi; Chirag B Patel; Diego I Ramos-Valadez; Eric M Haas
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2010-04-18       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Routine contrast imaging of low pelvic anastomosis prior to closure of defunctioning ileostomy: is it necessary?

Authors:  Matthew F Kalady; Christopher R Mantyh; Jason Petrofski; Kirk A Ludwig
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-03-27       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 9.  Pouch reconstruction in the pelvis.

Authors:  H-P Bruch; O Schwandner; S Farke; J Nolde
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2003-03-25       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 10.  Ileal pouch surgery for ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Simon P Bach; Neil J Mortensen
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.