Literature DB >> 9151010

Hip fractures. Epidemiology, risk factors, falls, energy absorption, hip protectors, and prevention.

J B Lauritzen1.   

Abstract

The present review summarizes the pathogenic mechanisms leading to hip fracture based on epidemiological, experimental, and controlled studies. The estimated lifetime risk of hip fracture is about 14% in postmenopausal women and 6% in men. The incidence of hip fractures increases exponentially with aging, but the time-trend in increasing age-specific incidence may not be a universal phenomenon. Postmenopausal women suffering earlier non-hip fractures have an increased risk of later hip fracture. The relative risk being highest within the first years following the fracture. Nursing home residents have a high risk of hip fracture (annual rate of 5-6%), and the incidence of falls is about 1,500 falls/1,000 persons/year. Most hip fractures are a result of a direct trauma against the hip. The incidence of falls on the hip among nursing home residents is about 290 falls/1,000 persons/year and about 24% of these impacts lead to hip fracture. The force acting on the hip may reach 3.7 kN in falls on the hip from standing height, which means that only susceptible subjects will sustain a hip fracture in such falls. The effective load acting on the hip is 35% of the body weight in unprotected falls on the hip. Women with hip fractures have a lower body weight compared with controls, and they may also have less soft tissue covering the hip even when adjusted for body mass index, indicating a more android body habitus. Experimental studies show that the passive energy absorption in soft tissue covering the hip may influence the risk of hip fracture, and being an important determinant for the development of hip fracture, maybe more important than bone strength. External hip protectors were developed and tested in an open randomised nursing home study. The rate of hip fractures was reduced by 50%, corresponding to 9 out of 247 residents saved from sustaining a hip fracture. The review points to the essentials of the development of hip fracture, which constitutes; risk of fall, type of fall, type of impact, energy absorption, and lastly bone strength, which is the ultimate and last permissive factor in the cascade leading to hip fracture. Risk estimation and prevention of hip fractures may prove realistic when these issues are taken into consideration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9151010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dan Med Bull        ISSN: 0907-8916


  16 in total

1.  Hip fracture prevention strategies in long-term care: a survey of Canadian physicians' opinions.

Authors:  Anna M Sawka; Nofisat Ismaila; Parminder Raina; Lehana Thabane; Sharon Straus; Jonathan D Adachi; Amiram Gafni; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  The use of hip protectors in long-term care facilities: a survey of nursing home staff.

Authors:  Anna M Sawka; Madeline Nixon; Lora Giangregorio; Lehana Thabane; Jonathan D Adachi; Amiram Gafni; Ron Goeree; Parminder Raina; Jennifer Ranford; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  J Am Med Dir Assoc       Date:  2007-04-18       Impact factor: 4.669

Review 3.  A scoping review of strategies for the prevention of hip fracture in elderly nursing home residents.

Authors:  Anna M Sawka; Nofisat Ismaila; Ann Cranney; Lehana Thabane; Monika Kastner; Amiram Gafni; Linda J Woodhouse; Richard Crilly; Angela M Cheung; Jonathan D Adachi; Robert G Josse; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-03       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Dietary fat, saturated fatty acid, and monounsaturated fatty acid intakes and risk of bone fracture: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.

Authors:  H Mozaffari; K Djafarian; M D Mofrad; S Shab-Bidar
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Childhood obesity is associated with increased risk of most lower extremity fractures.

Authors:  Jeff Kessler; Corinna Koebnick; Ning Smith; Annette Adams
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Editorial: Orthogeriatrics and Hip Fractures.

Authors:  A M Sanford; J E Morley; A McKee
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

7.  Evaluation of compressive strength index of the femoral neck in Caucasians and chinese.

Authors:  Na Yu; Yong-Jun Liu; Yufang Pei; Lei Zhang; Shufeng Lei; Niraj R Kothari; Ding-You Li; Christopher J Papasian; James Hamilton; Ji-Qun Cai; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 4.333

8.  Ethnic differences in composite indices of femoral neck strength.

Authors:  S Ishii; J A Cauley; G A Greendale; M E Danielson; N Safaei Nili; A Karlamangla
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Hip protector compliance among older people living in residential care homes.

Authors:  C Cryer; A Knox; D Martin; J Barlow
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.399

10.  What are the beliefs, attitudes and practices of front-line staff in long-term care (LTC) facilities related to osteoporosis awareness, management and fracture prevention?

Authors:  Arthur N Lau; George Ioannidis; Yelena Potts; Lora M Giangregorio; Mary-Lou Van der Horst; Jonathan D Adachi; Alexandra Papaioannou
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2010-10-08       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.