Literature DB >> 9150399

Assessing the reliability of RNA folding using statistical mechanics.

M Huynen1, R Gutell, D Konings.   

Abstract

We have analyzed the base-pairing probability distributions of 16 S and 16 S-like, and 23 S and 23 S-like ribosomal RNAs of Archaea, Bacteria, chloroplasts, mitochondria and Eukarya, as predicted by the partition function approach for RNA folding introduced by McCaskill. A quantitative analysis of the reliability of RNA folding is done by comparing the base-pairing probability distributions with the structures predicted by comparative sequence analysis (comparative structures). We distinguish two factors that show a relationship to the reliability of RNA minimum free energy structure. The first factor is the dominance of one particular base-pair or the absence of base-pairing for a given base within the base-pairing probability distribution (BPPD). We characterize the BPPD per base, including the probability of not base-pairing, by its Shannon entropy (S). The S value indicates the uncertainty about the base-pairing of a base: low S values result from BPPDs that are strongly dominated by a single base-pair or by the absence of base-pairing. We show that bases with low S values have a relatively high probability that their minimum free energy (MFE) structure corresponds to the comparative structure. The BPPDs of prokaryotes that live at high temperatures (thermophilic Archaea and Bacteria) have, calculated at 37 degrees C, lower S values than the BPPDs of prokaryotes that live at lower temperatures (mesophilic and psychrophilic Archaea and Bacteria). This reflects an adaptation of the ribosomal RNAs to the environmental temperature. A second factor that is important to consider with regard to the reliability of MFE structure folding is a variable degree of applicability of the thermodynamic model of RNA folding for different groups of RNAs. Here we show that among the bases that show low S values, the Archaea and Bacteria have similar, high probabilities (0.96 and 0.94 in 16 S and 0.93 and 0.91 in 23 S, respectively) that the MFE structure corresponds to the comparative structure. These probabilities are lower in the chloroplasts (16 S 0.91, 23 S 0.79), mitochondria (16 S-like 0.89, 23 S-like 0.69) and Eukarya (18 S 0.81, 28 S 0.86).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9150399     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.0889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  47 in total

1.  Neutral evolution of mutational robustness.

Authors:  E van Nimwegen; J P Crutchfield; M Huynen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-17       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  RNA folding at elementary step resolution.

Authors:  C Flamm; W Fontana; I L Hofacker; P Schuster
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Profiling small RNA reveals multimodal substructural signals in a Boltzmann ensemble.

Authors:  Emily Rogers; Christine E Heitsch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  A software tool-box for analysis of regulatory RNA elements.

Authors:  Peter Bengert; Thomas Dandekar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Using an RNA secondary structure partition function to determine confidence in base pairs predicted by free energy minimization.

Authors:  David H Mathews
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.942

6.  Grass evolution inferred from chromosomal rearrangements and geometrical and statistical features in RNA structure.

Authors:  Gustavo Caetano-Anollés
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.395

7.  Unique folding of precursor microRNAs: quantitative evidence and implications for de novo identification.

Authors:  Stanley Ng Kwang Loong; Santosh K Mishra
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 4.942

8.  Automatic detection of conserved RNA structure elements in complete RNA virus genomes.

Authors:  I L Hofacker; M Fekete; C Flamm; M A Huynen; S Rauscher; P E Stolorz; P F Stadler
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Using reliability information to annotate RNA secondary structures.

Authors:  M Zuker; A B Jacobson
Journal:  RNA       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.942

10.  De novo computational prediction of non-coding RNA genes in prokaryotic genomes.

Authors:  Thao T Tran; Fengfeng Zhou; Sarah Marshburn; Mark Stead; Sidney R Kushner; Ying Xu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.