Literature DB >> 9622126

Using reliability information to annotate RNA secondary structures.

M Zuker1, A B Jacobson.   

Abstract

A number of heuristic descriptors have been developed previously in conjunction with the mfold package that describe the propensity of individual bases to participate in base pairs and whether or not a predicted helix is "well-determined." They were developed for the "energy dot plot" output of mfold. Two descriptors, P-num and H-num, are used to measure the level of promiscuity in the association of any given nucleotide or helix with alternative complementary pairs. The third descriptor, S-num, measures the propensity of bases to be single-stranded. In the current work, we describe a series of programs that were developed in order to annotate individual structures with "well-definedness" information. We use color annotation to present the information. The programs can annotate PostScript files that are created by the mfold package or the PostScript secondary structure plots produced by the Weiser and Noller program XRNA (Weiser B, Noller HF, 1995, XRNA: Auto-interactive program for modeling RNA, The Center for Molecular Biology of RNA, Santa Cruz, California: University of California; Internet: ftp://fangio.ucsc.edu/pub/XRNA). In addition, these programs can annotate ss files that serve as input to XRNA. The annotation package can also handle structure comparison with a reference structure. This feature can be used to compare predicted structure with a phylogenetically deduced model, to compare two different predicted foldings, and to identify conformational changes that are predicted between wild-type and mutant RNAs. We provide several examples of application. Predicted structures of two RNase P RNAs were colored with P-num information and further annotated with comparative information. The comparative model of a 16S rRNA was annotated with P-num information from mfold and with base pair probabilities obtained from the Vienna RNA folding package. Further annotation adds comparisons with the optimal foldings obtained from mfold and the Vienna package, respectively. The results of all of these analyses are discussed in the context of the reliability of structure prediction.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9622126      PMCID: PMC1369649          DOI: 10.1017/s1355838298980116

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  RNA        ISSN: 1355-8382            Impact factor:   4.942


  18 in total

1.  The equilibrium partition function and base pair binding probabilities for RNA secondary structure.

Authors:  J S McCaskill
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1990 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.505

2.  Predicting optimal and suboptimal secondary structure for RNA.

Authors:  J A Jaeger; D H Turner; M Zuker
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 1.600

3.  A dynamic programming algorithm for finding alternative RNA secondary structures.

Authors:  A L Williams; I Tinoco
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1986-01-10       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Improved predictions of secondary structures for RNA.

Authors:  J A Jaeger; D H Turner; M Zuker
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  On finding all suboptimal foldings of an RNA molecule.

Authors:  M Zuker
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-04-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Nucleotide sequence of Thermus thermophilus HB8 gene coding 16S rRNA.

Authors:  N V Murzina; D P Vorozheykina; N I Matvienko
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1988-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Structural analysis by energy dot plot of a large mRNA.

Authors:  A B Jacobson; M Zuker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1993-09-20       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 8.  Structure of ribosomal RNA.

Authors:  H F Noller
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 23.643

9.  Characterization of the RNase P RNA of Sulfolobus acidocaldarius.

Authors:  T E LaGrandeur; S C Darr; E S Haas; N R Pace
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.490

10.  Nucleotide sequence of the gene encoding the RNA subunit (M1 RNA) of ribonuclease P from Escherichia coli.

Authors:  R E Reed; M F Baer; C Guerrier-Takada; H Donis-Keller; S Altman
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  62 in total

1.  Structure of a regulatory 3' untranslated region from Trypanosoma brucei.

Authors:  M Drozdz; C Clayton
Journal:  RNA       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 4.942

2.  Phenotypic characterization of three phylogenetically conserved stem-loop motifs in the mengovirus 3' untranslated region.

Authors:  H Duque; A C Palmenberg
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.103

3.  A selection system for identifying accessible sites in target RNAs.

Authors:  W H Pan; H F Devlin; C Kelley; H C Isom; G A Clawson
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.942

4.  Profiling small RNA reveals multimodal substructural signals in a Boltzmann ensemble.

Authors:  Emily Rogers; Christine E Heitsch
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Mfold web server for nucleic acid folding and hybridization prediction.

Authors:  Michael Zuker
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-07-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  Expression of a major surface protein of Trypanosoma brucei insect forms is controlled by the activity of mitochondrial enzymes.

Authors:  Erik Vassella; Matthias Probst; André Schneider; Erwin Studer; Christina Kunz Renggli; Isabel Roditi
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2004-06-16       Impact factor: 4.138

7.  Using an RNA secondary structure partition function to determine confidence in base pairs predicted by free energy minimization.

Authors:  David H Mathews
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.942

8.  Rational design of DNA sequences for nanotechnology, microarrays and molecular computers using Eulerian graphs.

Authors:  Petr Pancoska; Zdenek Moravek; Ute M Moll
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-08-27       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Comparing RNA secondary structures using a relaxed base-pair score.

Authors:  Phaedra Agius; Kristin P Bennett; Michael Zuker
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2010-04-01       Impact factor: 4.942

10.  Cis control of gene expression in E.coli by ribosome queuing at an inefficient translational stop signal.

Authors:  Haining Jin; Asgeir Björnsson; Leif A Isaksson
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 11.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.