Literature DB >> 9149592

Clinically recognized cardiac dysfunction: an independent determinant of mortality among critically ill patients. Is there a role for serial measurement of cardiac troponin I?

M H Kollef1, J H Ladenson, P R Eisenberg.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the relative importance of clinically recognized cardiac dysfunction and unrecognized cardiac injury to hospital mortality.
DESIGN: Prospective, blinded, single-center study.
SETTING: Medical ICU of Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, a university-affiliated teaching hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred sixty adult patients requiring admission to the medical ICU.
INTERVENTIONS: Daily blood collection. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The presence of cardiac dysfunction (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, cardiac arrest, or congestive heart failure) as determined by the physicians responsible for the care of the patient. Daily measurement of levels of cardiac troponin I, a sensitive, highly specific, and long-lived marker of myocardial injury.
RESULTS: Fifty-five (21.2%) patients had clinical evidence of cardiac dysfunction, among whom 22 (40%) had an elevated level of cardiac troponin I. A total of 41 (15.8%) patients had evidence of acute myocardial injury based on elevated levels of cardiac troponin I. Patients with clinically recognized cardiac dysfunction had a significantly greater hospital mortality rate compared to patients without clinically recognized cardiac dysfunction (45.5% vs 10.2%; p < 0.001). Similarly, patients with elevated blood levels of cardiac troponin I had a greater hospital mortality rate compared to patients without elevated blood levels of cardiac troponin I (26.8% vs 16.0%; p = 0.095). Multiple logistic-regression analysis controlling for potential confounding variables demonstrated that the presence of clinically recognized cardiac dysfunction was independently associated with hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio = 3.0; 95% confidence interval = 1.9 to 4.8; p = 0.016). However, having an elevated blood level of cardiac troponin I was not found to be an independent determinant of hospital mortality.
CONCLUSION: Among critically ill medical patients, clinically recognized cardiac dysfunction is an independent determinant of hospital mortality. The identification of unrecognized cardiac injury, using serial measurements of cardiac troponin I, did not independently contribute to the prediction of hospital mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9149592     DOI: 10.1378/chest.111.5.1340

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  17 in total

1.  Are troponins confusing?

Authors:  P O Collinson; P J Stubbs
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Troponin I in the intensive care unit setting: from the heart to the heart.

Authors:  Chiara Lazzeri; Manuela Bonizzoli; Giovanni Cianchi; Gian Franco Gensini; Adriano Peris
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2008-03-07       Impact factor: 3.397

Review 3.  Troponin: the biomarker of choice for the detection of cardiac injury.

Authors:  Luciano Babuin; Allan S Jaffe
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Role of tissue disorder markers in the evaluation of disease progress and outcome prediction: a prospective cohort study in non-cardiac critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jing Ye; Zi Chen; Tingsong Wang; Jianjing Tong; Xiaoguang Li; Jie Jiang; Erzhen Chen; Yiming Lu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.352

5.  Cardiac troponin I in patients with severe exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  Christophe Baillard; Mohamed Boussarsar; Jean-Philippe Fosse; Emmanuelle Girou; Philippe Le Toumelin; Christophe Cracco; Samir Jaber; Yves Cohen; Laurent Brochard
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  The impact of cardiac dysfunction on acute respiratory distress syndrome and mortality in mechanically ventilated patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: an observational study.

Authors:  Brian M Fuller; Nicholas M Mohr; Thomas J Graetz; Isaac P Lynch; Matthew Dettmer; Kevin Cullison; Talia Coney; Swetha Gogineni; Robert Gregory
Journal:  J Crit Care       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 3.425

7.  The clinical significance of cardiac troponins in medical practice.

Authors:  Mohammed A Al-Otaiby; Hussein S Al-Amri; Abdulrahman M Al-Moghairi
Journal:  J Saudi Heart Assoc       Date:  2010-10-20

8.  Mortality in sepsis: Comparison of outcomes between patients with demand ischemia, acute myocardial infarction, and neither demand ischemia nor acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mahek Shah; Soumya Patnaik; Obiora Maludum; Brijesh Patel; Byomesh Tripathi; Manyoo Agarwal; Lohit Garg; Sahil Agrawal; Ulrich P Jorde; Matthew W Martinez
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-07-17       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Elevated troponin T concentrations in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Jacqueline M T Klein Gunnewiek; Joris J J P M van de Leur
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 17.440

10.  The role of cardiac troponin I as a prognosticator in critically ill medical patients: a prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Daniel A King; Shlomi Codish; Victor Novack; Leonid Barski; Yaniv Almog
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2005-05-31       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.