Literature DB >> 9148102

Microsurgery without a microscope: laboratory evaluation of a three-dimensional on-screen microsurgery system.

R J Franken1, S C Gupta, J C Banis, S V Thomas, J W Derr, S A Klein, M Kon, J H Barker.   

Abstract

In microvascular surgery, procedures may be both technically and physically demanding. Precise movements sustained over long hours in addition to typically compromised surgeon and assistant positioning lead quickly to physical and mental fatigue. Many of the positioning problems encountered are related to the fact that the eyes of the surgeon must be continually fixed to the microscope eyepieces. This study explores a possible solution: a microscope system that eliminates the need to view the operative field through the microscope eyepieces. A Three-dimensional On-screen Microsurgical System (TOMS) was used and contrasted with conventional operative microvascular surgery in the laboratory setting. The surgeon's comfort, his ability to instruct microsurgical technique, pertinent technological performance, and the procedure itself were evaluated using a standardized questionnaire. Based on data collected in this study, we conclude that divorcing the surgeon's eyes from the microscope eyepieces using the TOMS may make prolonged microvascular procedures less physically demanding and may increase the comfort level of both the surgeon and his assistant, although refinements to the technology are required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 9148102     DOI: 10.1002/micr.1920161109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsurgery        ISSN: 0738-1085            Impact factor:   2.425


  6 in total

1.  THE INTEGRATIVE SURGICAL THEATER: Combining Intraoperative Optical Coherence Tomography and 3D Digital Visualization for Vitreoretinal Surgery in the DISCOVER Study.

Authors:  Justis P Ehlers; Atsuro Uchida; Sunil K Srivastava
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Effect of alternative video displays on postures, perceived effort, and performance during microsurgery skill tasks.

Authors:  Denny Yu; Cooper Green; Steven J Kasten; Michael E Sackllah; Thomas J Armstrong
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 3.661

Review 3.  Opportunities and challenges of using augmented reality and heads-up display in orthopaedic surgery: A narrative review.

Authors:  Joon Ha; Priya Parekh; David Gamble; James Masters; Peter Jun; Thomas Hester; Timothy Daniels; Mansur Halai
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-05

Review 4.  Periodontal microsurgery: Reaching new heights of precision.

Authors:  Vikender Singh Yadav; Sanjeev Kumar Salaria; Anu Bhatia; Renu Yadav
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

5.  A comparison of using a smartphone versus a surgical microscope for microsurgical anastomosis in a non-living model.

Authors:  Surut Jianmongkol; Chaiyos Vinitpairot; Navapong Thitiworakarn; Settapon Wattanakamolchai
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2022-01-15

6.  Surgeon's comfort: The ergonomics of a robotic exoscope using a head-mounted display.

Authors:  Anto Abramovic; Matthias Demetz; Aleksandrs Krigers; Marlies Bauer; Sara Lener; Daniel Pinggera; Johannes Kerschbaumer; Sebastian Hartmann; Helga Fritsch; Claudius Thomé; Christian F Freyschlag
Journal:  Brain Spine       Date:  2021-12-28
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.