Literature DB >> 9145129

Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flaps.

S S Kroll1, G P Reece, M J Miller, G R Evans, G L Robb, B J Baldwin, B G Wang, M A Schusterman.   

Abstract

This study compared nipple projection after nipple reconstruction (following breast mound reconstruction) with either the modified double-opposing tab flap or the star flap. Areolar reconstruction and pigmentation of the nipple were achieved with tattooing. Nipple projection for 153 nipples was measured at least 6 months after the reconstruction, when projection was believed to have become stable. Mean follow-up was 2.27 years. In the 106 nipples reconstructed with modified double-opposing tab flaps, the mean projection was 2.4292 mm, while in the 47 nipples reconstructed with star flaps, the mean projection was 1.9681 mm (p = 0.021). We conclude that although both methods are effective, the modified double-opposing tab flap has slightly more projection after approximately 2 years. It is not known, however, whether this is because of reduced flap atrophy or longer initial projection by the modified double-opposing tab flap; further studies are ongoing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9145129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  12 in total

1.  Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction: A Review of the Literature and Introduction of the Rectangle-to-Cube Nipple Flap.

Authors:  Joshua T Henderson; Thomas J Lee; Andrew M Swiergosz; Andrea R Hiller; Joshua Choo; Bradon J Wilhelmi
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2018-03-19

Review 2.  Nipple-areola complex reconstruction.

Authors:  Anongporn Nimboriboonporn; Suebwong Chuthapisith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2014-02

3.  Nipple Reconstruction: Risk Factors and Complications after 189 Procedures.

Authors:  Arash Momeni; Mina Ghaly; Deepak Gupta; Yvonne L Karanas; David M Kahn; Geoffrey C Gurtner; Gordon K Lee
Journal:  Eur J Plast Surg       Date:  2013-10-01

4.  Simultaneous nipple reconstruction in autologous breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Jong Ho Lee; Jeong Yeop Ryu; Jung Ho Lee; Jeeyeon Lee; Ho Yong Park; Jung Dug Yang; Joon Seok Lee
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-10

5.  Dual Extrusion Patterning Drives Tissue Development Aesthetics and Shape Retention in 3D Printed Nipple-Areola Constructs.

Authors:  Sarah Van Belleghem; Bhushan Mahadik; Kirstie Snodderly; Zoe Mote; Bin Jiang; Justine R Yu; Shannon McLoughlin; Xiaoming He; Arthur J Nam; John P Fisher
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 9.933

6.  Upper Blepharoplasty for Areola Reconstruction.

Authors:  O L Friedrich; J Heil; M Golatta; C Domschke; C Sohn; M Blumenstein
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  The angel flap for nipple reconstruction.

Authors:  Wendy W Wong; Matthew A Hiersche; Mark C Martin
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2013

8.  Acellular Dermal Matrix as a Core Strut for Projection in Nipple Reconstruction: Approaches for Three Different Methods of Breast Reconstruction.

Authors:  Gui-Yong Park; Eul-Sik Yoon; Hee-Eun Cho; Byung-Il Lee; Seung-Ha Park
Journal:  Arch Plast Surg       Date:  2016-09-21

9.  Patient satisfaction following nipple reconstruction incorporating autologous costal cartilage.

Authors:  Joan E Lipa; Patrick D Addison; Peter C Neligan
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2008

10.  A modified technique for nipple-areola complex reconstruction.

Authors:  Shoeib A Mohamed; Peir Camillo Parodi
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2011-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.