Literature DB >> 34617414

Dual Extrusion Patterning Drives Tissue Development Aesthetics and Shape Retention in 3D Printed Nipple-Areola Constructs.

Sarah Van Belleghem1, Bhushan Mahadik1, Kirstie Snodderly1, Zoe Mote1, Bin Jiang1, Justine R Yu1, Shannon McLoughlin1, Xiaoming He1, Arthur J Nam2, John P Fisher3.   

Abstract

Breast cancer and its most radical treatment, the mastectomy, significantly impose both physical transformations and emotional pain in thousands of women across the globe. Restoring the natural appearance of a nipple-areola complex directly on the reconstructed breast represents an important psychological healing experience for these women and remains an unresolved clinical challenge, as current restorative techniques render a flattened disfigured skin tab within a single year. To provide a long-term solution for nipple reconstruction, this work presents 3D printed hybrid scaffolds composed of complementary biodegradable gelatin methacrylate and synthetic non-degradable poly(ethylene) glycol hydrogels to foster the regeneration of a viable nipple-areola complex. In vitro results showcased the robust structural capacity and long-term shape retention of the nipple projection amidst internal fibroblastic contraction, while in vivo subcutaneous implantation of the 3D printed nipple-areola demonstrated minimal fibrotic encapsulation, neovascularization, and the formation of healthy granulation tissue. Envisioned as subdermal implants, these nipple-areola bioprinted regenerative grafts have the potential to transform the appearance of the newly reconstructed breast, reduce subsequent surgical intervention, and revolutionize breast reconstruction practices.
© 2021 Wiley-VCH GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; breast reconstruction; composite scaffolds; gelatin methacrylate; nipple-areola constructs; poly(ethylene) glycol

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34617414      PMCID: PMC8665136          DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202101249

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater        ISSN: 2192-2640            Impact factor:   9.933


  45 in total

1.  Nipple-areola reconstruction with a dermal-fat flap: technical improvement from rolled auricular cartilage to artificial bone.

Authors:  Hiroko Yanaga
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 2.  A Review of Anatomy, Physiology, and Benign Pathology of the Nipple.

Authors:  Kimberly Stone; Amanda Wheeler
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 5.344

3.  Nipple reconstruction with C-v flap using dermofat graft.

Authors:  SuRak Eo; Steve S Kim; Andrew L Da Lio
Journal:  Ann Plast Surg       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.539

4.  Comparison of nipple projection with the modified double-opposing tab and star flaps.

Authors:  S S Kroll; G P Reece; M J Miller; G R Evans; G L Robb; B J Baldwin; B G Wang; M A Schusterman
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.730

Review 5.  Nipple-sparing mastectomy in breast cancer: a viable option?

Authors:  H A Cense; E J Rutgers; M Lopes Cardozo; J J Van Lanschot
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.424

6.  Characterization of cellular response to silicone implants in rats: implications for foreign-body carcinogenesis.

Authors:  S J James; M Pogribna; B J Miller; B Bolon; L Muskhelishvili
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 12.479

7.  Characterization of an Acellular Scaffold for a Tissue Engineering Approach to the Nipple-Areolar Complex Reconstruction.

Authors:  Nicholas C Pashos; Michelle E Scarritt; Zachary R Eagle; Jeffrey M Gimble; Abigail E Chaffin; Bruce A Bunnell
Journal:  Cells Tissues Organs       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 2.481

8.  Patient satisfaction in relation to nipple reconstruction: the importance of information provision.

Authors:  D Harcourt; C Russell; J Hughes; P White; C Nduka; R Smith
Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg       Date:  2010-07-16       Impact factor: 2.740

9.  Assessment of long-term nipple projection: a comparison of three techniques.

Authors:  Kenneth C Shestak; Allen Gabriel; Alan Landecker; Shane Peters; Adam Shestak; James Kim
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 4.730

10.  Depression in breast cancer patients who have undergone mastectomy: A national cohort study.

Authors:  Min-Su Kim; So Young Kim; Jin-Hwan Kim; Bumjung Park; Hyo Geun Choi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  3D and 4D Printing in the Fight against Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Sofia Moroni; Luca Casettari; Dimitrios A Lamprou
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-26
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.