Literature DB >> 9144209

Population dynamics, demographic stochasticity, and the evolution of cooperation.

M Doebeli1, A Blarer, M Ackermann.   

Abstract

A basic evolutionary problem posed by the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma game is to understand when the paradigmatic cooperative strategy Tit-for-Tat can invade a population of pure defectors. Deterministically, this is impossible. We consider the role of demographic stochasticity by embedding the Iterated Prisoner's Dilemma into a population dynamic framework. Tit-for-Tat can invade a population of defectors when their dynamics exhibit short episodes of high population densities with subsequent crashes and long low density periods with strong genetic drift. Such dynamics tend to have reddened power spectra and temporal distributions of population size that are asymmetric and skewed toward low densities. The results indicate that ecological dynamics are important for evolutionary shifts between adaptive peaks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9144209      PMCID: PMC24650          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  9 in total

1.  Ecology, evolution and 1 f -noise.

Authors:  J M Halley
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 17.712

2.  Simple mathematical models with very complicated dynamics.

Authors:  R M May
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Evolutionary predictions from invariant physical measures of dynamic processes.

Authors:  M Doebeli
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1995-04-21       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  In the red zone.

Authors:  A Blarer; M Doebeli
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-04-18       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Unexpected dominance of high frequencies in chaotic nonlinear population models.

Authors:  J E Cohen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1995-12-07       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  A strategy of win-stay, lose-shift that outperforms tit-for-tat in the Prisoner's Dilemma game.

Authors:  M Nowak; K Sigmund
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  The evolution of cooperation.

Authors:  R Axelrod; W D Hamilton
Journal:  Science       Date:  1981-03-27       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  The shifting balance theory and macroevolution.

Authors:  S Wright
Journal:  Annu Rev Genet       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 16.830

9.  The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I.

Authors:  W D Hamilton
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.691

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Demography and ecology drive variation in cooperation across human populations.

Authors:  Shakti Lamba; Ruth Mace
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Eco-evolutionary feedback and the invasion of cooperation in prisoner's dilemma games.

Authors:  Feng Zhang; Cang Hui
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.