Literature DB >> 9142789

Detection of resistance to isoniazid, rifampin, and streptomycin in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by molecular methods.

I Nachamkin1, C Kang, M P Weinstein.   

Abstract

Molecular techniques can detect drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis, but whether these methods are practical for clinical laboratory use and the management of tuberculosis is unclear. We evaluated several available molecular methods (restriction fragment length polymorphism [RFLP], heteroduplex, and direct DNA sequence analyses) for detecting resistance to isoniazid, rifampin, and streptomycin and compared these methods with conventional methods for susceptibility testing. RFLP analysis detected the mutation at position S315T in katG in 12 (44.4%) of 27 isoniazid-resistant strains. Heteroduplex analysis of rpoB, detected 16 (76.2%) of 21 rifampin-resistant strains, whereas direct DNA sequencing detected all rifampin-resistant strains. RFLP analysis of the rpsL gene detected only nine (28.1%) of 32 streptomycin-resistant strains, while direct DNA sequencing detected nearly 68% of streptomycin-resistant strains. The specificity of all of the above-mentioned methods was excellent. RFLP analysis for katG and direct DNA sequencing of rpoB and rpsL may be practical methods for routine use in clinical microbiology laboratories or molecular pathology laboratories with good molecular capabilities and autosequencers. Despite the less than optimal sensitivity for some assays, resistance can be detected rapidly. However, molecular methods are not yet capable of replacing more traditional methods of susceptibility testing for M. tuberculosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9142789     DOI: 10.1093/clinids/24.5.894

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  21 in total

1.  Analysis for a limited number of gene codons can predict drug resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in a high-incidence community.

Authors:  A Van Rie ; R Warren; I Mshanga; A M Jordaan; G D van der Spuy ; M Richardson; J Simpson; R P Gie; D A Enarson; N Beyers; P D van Helden ; T C Victor
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Sequence-based identification of Mycobacterium species using the MicroSeq 500 16S rDNA bacterial identification system.

Authors:  J B Patel; D G Leonard; X Pan; J M Musser; R E Berman; I Nachamkin
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  rpoB mutations in multidrug-resistant strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolated in Italy.

Authors:  G Pozzi; M Meloni; E Iona; G Orrù; O F Thoresen; M L Ricci; M R Oggioni; L Fattorini; G Orefici
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 4.  Molecular detection of antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  A C Fluit; M R Visser; F J Schmitz
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 5.  The role of DNA amplification technology in the diagnosis of infectious diseases.

Authors:  M Louie; L Louie; A E Simor
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-08-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 6.  Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, drug resistance mechanisms, and therapy of infections with nontuberculous mycobacteria.

Authors:  Barbara A Brown-Elliott; Kevin A Nash; Richard J Wallace
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Rapid determination of rifampin resistance in clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Tanil Kocagoz; Zeynep Saribas; Alpaslan Alp
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  New multiplex PCR for rapid detection of isoniazid-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates.

Authors:  Laura Herrera-León; Tamara Molina; Pilar Saíz; Juan Antonio Sáez-Nieto; Maria Soledad Jiménez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Comparison of polymerase chain reaction and standard microbiological techniques in presumed bacterial corneal ulcers.

Authors:  Anita Panda; Tajinder Pal Singh; Geeta Satpathy; Meenakshi Wadhwani
Journal:  Int Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 2.031

Review 10.  Genetic methods for assessing antimicrobial resistance.

Authors:  F R Cockerill
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.