Literature DB >> 9142003

Prospective study of asymptomatic valvular aortic stenosis. Clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise predictors of outcome.

C M Otto1, I G Burwash, M E Legget, B I Munt, M Fujioka, N L Healy, C D Kraft, C Y Miyake-Hull, R G Schwaegler.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Only limited data on the rate of hemodynamic progression and predictors of outcome in asymptomatic patients with valvular aortic stenosis (AS) are available. METHODS AND
RESULTS: In 123 adults (mean age, 63 +/- 16 years) with asymptomatic AS, annual clinical, echocardiographic, and exercise data were obtained prospectively (mean follow-up of 2.5 +/- 1.4 years). Aortic jet velocity increased by 0.32 +/- 0.34 m/s per year and mean gradient by 7 +/- 7 mm Hg per year; valve area decreased by 0.12 +/- 0.19 cm2 per year. Kaplan-Meier event-free survival, with end points defined as death (n = 8) or aortic valve surgery (n = 48), was 93 +/- 5% at 1 year, 62 +/- 8% at 3 years, and 26 +/- 10% at 5 years. Univariate predictors of outcome included baseline jet velocity, mean gradient, valve area, and the rate of increase in jet velocity (all P < or = .001) but not age, sex, or cause of AS. Those with an end point had a smaller exercise increase in valve area, blood pressure, and cardiac output and a greater exercise decrease in stroke volume. Multivariate predictors of outcome were jet velocity at baseline (P < .0001), the rate of change in jet velocity (P < .0001), and functional status score (P = .002). The likelihood of remaining alive without valve replacement at 2 years was only 21 +/- 18% for a jet velocity at entry > 4.0 m/s, compared with 66 +/- 13% for a velocity of 3.0 to 4.0 m/s and 84 +/- 16% for a jet velocity < 3.0 m/s (P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: In adults with asymptomatic AS, the rate of hemodynamic progression and clinical outcome are predicted by jet velocity, the rate of change in jet velocity, and functional status.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9142003     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.95.9.2262

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  161 in total

Review 1.  Timing of aortic valve surgery.

Authors:  C M Otto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 2.  Pathophysiology of valvular heart disease: implications for nuclear imaging.

Authors:  Blasé Carabello
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 3.  The medical management of valvar heart disease.

Authors:  N A Boon; P Bloomfield
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Aortic Stenosis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2000-04

5.  Surgery in asymptomatic aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Gerald P McCann; W Stewart Hillis
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-10

6.  Risk factors for progression of calcific aortic stenosis and potential therapeutic targets.

Authors:  Ashvin R Kamath; Ramdas G Pai
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2008

7.  Incremental prognostic role of left atrial reservoir strain in asymptomatic patients with moderate aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Andrea Sonaglioni; Gian Luigi Nicolosi; Elisabetta Rigamonti; Michele Lombardo
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-02-05       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Natriuretic peptides in the management of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Jutta Bergler-Klein
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 2.931

9.  Timing of surgery in aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Siva B Mohan; George A Stouffer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2006-12

Review 10.  Vascular calcification: an update on mechanisms and challenges in treatment.

Authors:  Meiting Wu; Cameron Rementer; Cecilia M Giachelli
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 4.333

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.