Literature DB >> 9141907

Information and viewpoint dependence in face recognition.

H Hill1, P G Schyns, S Akamatsu.   

Abstract

How we recognize faces despite rotations in depth is of great interest to psychologists, computer scientists and neurophysiologists because of the accuracy of human performance despite the intrinsic difficulty of the task. Three experiments are reported here which used three-dimensional facial surface representations to investigate the effects of rotations in depth on a face recognition task. Experiment 1, using "shape only" representations, showed that all the views used (full-face, three-quarter and profile) were equally well recognized when all had been learned. Performance was better when the same views were presented in an animated sequence rather than at random, suggesting that structure-from-motion provides useful information for recognition. When stimuli were presented inverted, performance was worse and there were differences in the recognizability of views, demonstrating that the familiarity of upright faces affects generalization across views. Experiments 2 and 3 investigated generalization from single views and found performance to be dependent on learned view. In both experiments, generalization from learned full-face fell off with increasing angle of rotation. With shape only stimuli, three-quarter views generalized well to each other, even when inverted but for profiles generalization was equally bad to all unlearned views. This difference may be explained because of the particular relationship of the profile to the axis of symmetry. In Experiment 3, addition of information about superficial properties including color and texture facilitated performance, but patterns of generalization remained substantially the same, emphasizing the importance of underlying shape information. However, generalization from the three-quarter view became viewpoint invariant and there was some evidence for better generalization between profiles. The results are interpreted as showing that three-dimensional shape information is fundamental for recognition across rotations in depth although superficial information may also be used to reduce viewpoint dependence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9141907     DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00785-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  36 in total

1.  The contribution of symmetry and motion to the recognition of faces at novel orientations.

Authors:  Thomas A Busey; Safa R Zaki
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2004-09

2.  A search advantage for faces learned in motion.

Authors:  Karin S Pilz; Ian M Thornton; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The role of long-term and short-term familiarity in visual and haptic face recognition.

Authors:  Sarah J Casey; Fiona N Newell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  What makes faces special?

Authors:  Xiaomin Yue; Bosco S Tjan; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-08-30       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  When do infants differentiate profile face from frontal face? A near-infrared spectroscopic study.

Authors:  Emi Nakato; Yumiko Otsuka; So Kanazawa; Masami K Yamaguchi; Shoko Watanabe; Ryusuke Kakigi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Turning the other cheek: the viewpoint dependence of facial expression after-effects.

Authors:  Christopher P Benton; Peter J Etchells; Gillian Porter; Andrew P Clark; Ian S Penton-Voak; Stavri G Nikolov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Symmetry perception by poultry chicks and its implications for three-dimensional object recognition.

Authors:  Elena Mascalzoni; Daniel Osorio; Lucia Regolin; Giorgio Vallortigara
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-09-14       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Intraoperative cortical surface characterization using laser range scanning: preliminary results.

Authors:  Tuhin K Sinha; Michael I Miga; David M Cash; Robert J Weil
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Limits of dynamic object perception in pigeons: dynamic stimulus presentation does not enhance perception and discrimination of complex shape.

Authors:  Michaela Loidolt; Ulrike Aust; Michael Steurer; Nikolaus F Troje; Ludwig Huber
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.986

Review 10.  Face Processing Systems: From Neurons to Real-World Social Perception.

Authors:  Winrich Freiwald; Bradley Duchaine; Galit Yovel
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 12.449

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.