Literature DB >> 9141217

Clinical immunogenicity and tolerance studies of liquid vaccines delivered by jet-injector and a new single-use cartridge (Imule): comparison with standard syringe injection. Imule Investigators Group.

I Parent du Châtelet1, J Lang, M Schlumberger, E Vidor, G Soula, A Genet, S M Standaert, P Saliou.   

Abstract

A new needleless jet-injector, Mini-Imojet, was developed that administers liquid vaccines from a single-use, pre-filled cartridge named Imule, which avoids the risk of cross-contamination. We conducted clinical trials in several settings in France and West Africa to compare the immunogenicity and tolerance of five vaccines (influenza vaccine, Vi capsular polysaccharide typhoid vaccine, tetanus toxoid vaccine, diphtheria-tetanus-whole cell pertussis vaccine, and inactivated hepatitis A vaccine) administered with the Imule system vs standard syringe technique. In each vaccine study, all subjects of either group were tested for serum antibody titres to calculate the geometrical mean titres and seroconversion rates after complete vaccination. Immediate local-reactions were noted after each injection, and local and general reactions were evaluated during a predetermined period of follow-up. When delivered by the Imule technique, all the administered vaccines were of equivalent or superior immunogenicity, compared to the syringe technique. The tolerance to vaccines injected by the Imule system was acceptable in all studies. The most frequently observed reactions were mild (e.g. minor bleeding, superficial papules, erythema and induration) and could be considered to be inherent to the injection technique. The technical and safety advantages of the Mini-Imojet/Imule system, compared to sterilizable, standard disposable or autodestruct syringes and to classical multi-dose vial jet-injectors, reinforces the interest of this new injection technique for collective immunizations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9141217     DOI: 10.1016/s0264-410x(96)00173-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vaccine        ISSN: 0264-410X            Impact factor:   3.641


  7 in total

1.  Serum and mucosal immune responses to an inactivated influenza virus vaccine induced by epidermal powder immunization.

Authors:  D Chen; S B Periwal; K Larrivee; C Zuleger; C A Erickson; R L Endres; L G Payne
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 2.  Infants and the seasonal influenza vaccine. A global perspective on safety, effectiveness, and alternate forms of protection.

Authors:  Leah F Moriarty; Saad B Omer
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Syringe free vaccination with CAF01 Adjuvated Ag85B-ESAT-6 in Bioneedles provides strong and prolonged protection against tuberculosis.

Authors:  Dennis Christensen; Thomas Lindenstrøm; Gijsbert van de Wijdeven; Peter Andersen; Else Marie Agger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Novel approaches to vaccine delivery.

Authors:  Derek T O'Hagan; Rino Rappuoli
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 5.  Delivery technologies for human vaccines.

Authors:  Philippe Moingeon; Charles de Taisne; Jeffrey Almond
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.291

Review 6.  Recent advances in the discovery and delivery of vaccine adjuvants.

Authors:  Derek T O'Hagan; Nicholas M Valiante
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 84.694

Review 7.  Subcutaneous vaccine administration - an outmoded practice.

Authors:  Ian F Cook
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.452

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.