Literature DB >> 11483740

Serum and mucosal immune responses to an inactivated influenza virus vaccine induced by epidermal powder immunization.

D Chen1, S B Periwal, K Larrivee, C Zuleger, C A Erickson, R L Endres, L G Payne.   

Abstract

Both circulating and mucosal antibodies are considered important for protection against infection by influenza virus in humans and animals. However, current inactivated vaccines administered by intramuscular injection using a syringe and needle elicit primarily circulating antibodies. In this study, we report that epidermal powder immunization (EPI) via a unique powder delivery system elicits both serum and mucosal antibodies to an inactivated influenza virus vaccine. Serum antibody responses to influenza vaccine following EPI were enhanced by codelivery of cholera toxin (CT), a synthetic oligodeoxynucleotide containing immunostimulatory CpG motifs (CpG DNA), or the combination of these two adjuvants. In addition, secretory immunoglobulin A (sIgA) antibodies were detected in the saliva and mucosal lavages of the small intestine, trachea, and vaginal tract, although the titers were much lower than the IgG titers. The local origin of the sIgA antibodies was further shown by measuring antibodies released from cultured tracheal and small intestinal fragments and by detecting antigen-specific IgA-secreting cells in the lamina propria using ELISPOT assays. EPI with a single dose of influenza vaccine containing CT or CT and CpG DNA conferred complete protection against lethal challenges with an influenza virus isolated 30 years ago, whereas a prime and boost immunizations were required for protection in the absence of an adjuvant. The ability to elicit augmented circulating antibody and mucosal antibody responses makes EPI a promising alternative to needle injection for administering vaccines against influenza and other diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11483740      PMCID: PMC115039          DOI: 10.1128/jvi.75.17.7956-7965.2001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Virol        ISSN: 0022-538X            Impact factor:   5.103


  46 in total

1.  Iscom is an efficient mucosal delivery system for Mycoplasma mycoides subsp. mycoides (MmmSC) antigens inducing high mucosal and systemic antibody responses.

Authors:  I Abusugra; B Morein
Journal:  FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol       Date:  1999-01

2.  Pandemic versus epidemic influenza mortality: a pattern of changing age distribution.

Authors:  L Simonsen; M J Clarke; L B Schonberger; N H Arden; N J Cox; K Fukuda
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 5.226

3.  Immunity to vaginal infection by herpes simplex virus type 2 in adult mice: characterization of the immunoglobulins in vaginal mucus.

Authors:  E L Parr; J J Bozzola; M B Parr
Journal:  J Reprod Immunol       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.054

4.  Protection of mice against a lethal influenza virus challenge after immunization with yeast-derived secreted influenza virus hemagglutinin.

Authors:  X Saelens; P Vanlandschoot; W Martinet; M Maras; S Neirynck; R Contreras; W Fiers; W M Jou
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1999-02

5.  Respiratory mucosal immunization with reovirus serotype 1/L stimulates virus-specific humoral and cellular immune responses, including double-positive (CD4(+)/CD8(+)) T cells.

Authors:  S B Periwal; J J Cebra
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Influenza virus subtype cross-reactivities of haemagglutination inhibiting and virus neutralising serum antibodies induced by infection or vaccination with an ISCOM-based vaccine.

Authors:  G F Rimmelzwaan; M Baars; R van Beek; P de Lijster; J C de Jong; E C Claas; A D Osterhaus
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  1999-06-04       Impact factor: 3.641

7.  Transcutaneous immunization with bacterial ADP-ribosylating exotoxins as antigens and adjuvants.

Authors:  G M Glenn; T Scharton-Kersten; R Vassell; G R Matyas; C R Alving
Journal:  Infect Immun       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.441

Review 8.  Mucosal responses to parenteral and mucosal vaccines.

Authors:  D Kaul; P L Ogra
Journal:  Dev Biol Stand       Date:  1998

9.  Transcutaneous immunization with cholera toxin protects mice against lethal mucosal toxin challenge.

Authors:  G M Glenn; T Scharton-Kersten; R Vassell; C P Mallett; T L Hale; C R Alving
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  1998-10-01       Impact factor: 5.422

10.  Phase 1 evaluation of intranasal virosomal influenza vaccine with and without Escherichia coli heat-labile toxin in adult volunteers.

Authors:  U Glück; J O Gebbers; R Glück
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.103

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Pneumococcal and influenza vaccination: current situation and future prospects.

Authors:  F Horwood; J Macfarlane
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.139

2.  Induction of mucosal immunity through systemic immunization: Phantom or reality?

Authors:  Fei Su; Girishchandra B Patel; Songhua Hu; Wangxue Chen
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 3.  Micro-scale devices for transdermal drug delivery.

Authors:  Anubhav Arora; Mark R Prausnitz; Samir Mitragotri
Journal:  Int J Pharm       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 5.875

4.  Green tea cultivar 'Benifuuki' potentiates split vaccine-induced immunoglobulin A production.

Authors:  Yeong-Seon Won; Motofumi Kumazoe; Kanako Takamatsu; Yuki Shinoda; Saki Sonoda; Kenji Okada; Takehisa Okamoto; Hirofumi Tachibana
Journal:  J Nat Med       Date:  2016-08-03       Impact factor: 2.343

5.  Lung CD8+ T Cell Impairment Occurs during Human Metapneumovirus Infection despite Virus-Like Particle Induction of Functional CD8+ T Cells.

Authors:  Sherry C Wen; Jennifer E Schuster; Pavlo Gilchuk; Kelli L Boyd; Sebastian Joyce; John V Williams
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 6.  Microneedle and mucosal delivery of influenza vaccines.

Authors:  Sang-Moo Kang; Jae-Min Song; Yeu-Chun Kim
Journal:  Expert Rev Vaccines       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 5.217

7.  Contrasting effects of type I interferon as a mucosal adjuvant for influenza vaccine in mice and humans.

Authors:  Robert B Couch; Robert L Atmar; Thomas R Cate; John M Quarles; Wendy A Keitel; Nancy H Arden; Janet Wells; Diane Niño; Philip R Wyde
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2009-07-14       Impact factor: 3.641

8.  GM-CSF increases mucosal and systemic immunogenicity of an H1N1 influenza DNA vaccine administered into the epidermis of non-human primates.

Authors:  Peter T Loudon; Eric J Yager; Debbie T Lynch; Amithi Narendran; Cristy Stagnar; Anthony M Franchini; James T Fuller; Phil A White; Julia Nyuandi; Clayton A Wiley; Michael Murphey-Corb; Deborah H Fuller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Development of stable influenza vaccine powder formulations: challenges and possibilities.

Authors:  J-P Amorij; A Huckriede; J Wilschut; H W Frijlink; W L J Hinrichs
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 4.200

10.  Plasmid vectors encoding cholera toxin or the heat-labile enterotoxin from Escherichia coli are strong adjuvants for DNA vaccines.

Authors:  Joshua Arrington; Ralph P Braun; Lichun Dong; Deborah H Fuller; Michael D Macklin; Scott W Umlauf; Sarah J Wagner; Mary S Wu; Lendon G Payne; Joel R Haynes
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.