BACKGROUND: Most standard trauma score systems have been developed and validated in the United States. However, trauma differs between the United States and Germany. This prospective study tested the validity of eight current trauma scoring systems (Glasgow Coma Scale, Trauma Score, Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, TRISSTS, TRISSRTS, Prehospital Index, Polytraumaschluessel) in 612 patients in Cologne. METHODS: Between January 1, 1987, and December 31, 1987, 2,136 trauma related emergencies were seen by emergency physicians in the field. All trauma patients with a Trauma Score below 16 and a random sample of 10% of patients with a Trauma Score of 16 were included in the study (n = 625). Follow-up was successfully completed for 612 patients (97%). Their hospital outcome was correlated with their individual score result. RESULTS: All trauma score systems under study showed high accuracy rates. TRISSRTS and TRISSTS performed best with values of above 0.97 for the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the standard trauma score systems are valid tools for patient classification and support TRISSRTS as the international reference score system for the assessment of injury severity. This validation will allow comparisons between different trauma care systems.
BACKGROUND: Most standard trauma score systems have been developed and validated in the United States. However, trauma differs between the United States and Germany. This prospective study tested the validity of eight current trauma scoring systems (Glasgow Coma Scale, Trauma Score, Revised Trauma Score, Injury Severity Score, TRISSTS, TRISSRTS, Prehospital Index, Polytraumaschluessel) in 612 patients in Cologne. METHODS: Between January 1, 1987, and December 31, 1987, 2,136 trauma related emergencies were seen by emergency physicians in the field. All traumapatients with a Trauma Score below 16 and a random sample of 10% of patients with a Trauma Score of 16 were included in the study (n = 625). Follow-up was successfully completed for 612 patients (97%). Their hospital outcome was correlated with their individual score result. RESULTS: All trauma score systems under study showed high accuracy rates. TRISSRTS and TRISSTS performed best with values of above 0.97 for the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the standard trauma score systems are valid tools for patient classification and support TRISSRTS as the international reference score system for the assessment of injury severity. This validation will allow comparisons between different trauma care systems.
Authors: Ida Füglistaler-Montali; Corinna Attenberger; Philipp Füglistaler; Augustinus L Jacob; Felix Amsler; Thomas Gross Journal: World J Surg Date: 2009-11 Impact factor: 3.352