BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to document the present knowledge from the medical literature on (1) efficacy of aeromedical evacuation (helicopter emergency medical service, HEMS) and (2) influence of the level of the first receiving hospital on mortality of patients. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature between 1970 and 2003; identification of studies with an evidence level of at least III and included control group; own results. RESULTS: (1) 17 studies concerning the efficacy of HEMS were included into the review. No single study yielded shorter rescue times with the use of HEMS. 11 of 17 studies showed a significantly higher survival rate (8.2 to 52%) with the employment of HEMS especially with mid-degree polytrauma. (2) All 6 relevant studies dealing with hospital level found a considerable lower mortality rate (19 to 42%) for patients treated primarily at a level 1 trauma center or comparable institution. CONCLUSIONS: The analyzed studies showed a trend toward decreased mortality rates with the employment of HEMS. Considering the comparable hospital level and even longer rescue times with HEMS, these differences can be explained with higher quality of initial diagnosis and treatment of the HEMS rescue team. Furthermore, mortality rates can be lowered significantly through primary treatment at a level 1 trauma center. Thus, the more flexible choice of the first receiving hospital represents a specific, clinically relevant advantage of HEMS in emergency medicine.
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to document the present knowledge from the medical literature on (1) efficacy of aeromedical evacuation (helicopter emergency medical service, HEMS) and (2) influence of the level of the first receiving hospital on mortality of patients. METHODS: Systematic review of the literature between 1970 and 2003; identification of studies with an evidence level of at least III and included control group; own results. RESULTS: (1) 17 studies concerning the efficacy of HEMS were included into the review. No single study yielded shorter rescue times with the use of HEMS. 11 of 17 studies showed a significantly higher survival rate (8.2 to 52%) with the employment of HEMS especially with mid-degree polytrauma. (2) All 6 relevant studies dealing with hospital level found a considerable lower mortality rate (19 to 42%) for patients treated primarily at a level 1 trauma center or comparable institution. CONCLUSIONS: The analyzed studies showed a trend toward decreased mortality rates with the employment of HEMS. Considering the comparable hospital level and even longer rescue times with HEMS, these differences can be explained with higher quality of initial diagnosis and treatment of the HEMS rescue team. Furthermore, mortality rates can be lowered significantly through primary treatment at a level 1 trauma center. Thus, the more flexible choice of the first receiving hospital represents a specific, clinically relevant advantage of HEMS in emergency medicine.
Authors: J S Sampalis; R Denis; A Lavoie; P Fréchette; S Boukas; A Nikolis; D Benoit; D Fleiszer; R Brown; M Churchill-Smith; D Mulder Journal: J Trauma Date: 1999-04
Authors: M Frink; C Probst; F Hildebrand; M Richter; C Hausmanninger; B Wiese; C Krettek; H-C Pape Journal: Unfallchirurg Date: 2007-04 Impact factor: 1.000