Literature DB >> 9136275

Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space.

B Bridgeman1, S Peery, S Anand.   

Abstract

Studies of saccadic suppression and induced motion have suggested separate representations of visual space for perception and visually guided behavior. Because these methods required stimulus motion, subjects might have confounded motion and position. We separated cognitive and sensorimotor maps without motion of target, background, or eye, with an "induced Roelofs effects": a target inside an off-center frame appears biased opposite the direction of the frame. A frame displayed to the left of a subject's center line, for example, will make a target inside the frame appear farther to the right than its actual position. The effect always influences perception, but in half of our subjects it did not influence pointing. Cognitive and sensorimotor maps interacted when the motor response was delayed; all subjects now showed a Roelofs effect for pointing, suggesting that the motor system was being fed from the biased cognitive map. A second experiment showed similar results when subjects made an open-ended cognitive response instead of a five-alternative forced choice. Experiment 3 showed that the results were not due to shifts in subjects' perception of the felt straight-ahead position. In Experiment 4, subjects pointed to the target and judged its location on the same trail. Both measures showed a Roelofs effect, indicating that each trial was treated as a single event and that the cognitive representation was accessed to localize this event in both response modes.

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9136275     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211912

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  56 in total

1.  Two memories for geographical slant: separation and interdependence of action and awareness.

Authors:  S H Creem; D R Proffitt
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  1998-03

2.  Dissociation between location and shape in visual space.

Authors:  Jack M Loomis; John W Philbeck; Pavel Zahorik
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Schizophrenia patients show augmented spatial frame illusion for visual and visuomotor tasks.

Authors:  Y Chen; R McBain; D Norton; D Ongur
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  A step and a hop on the Müller-Lyer: illusion effects on lower-limb movements.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Delay improves performance on a haptic spatial matching task.

Authors:  Sander Zuidhoek; Astrid M L Kappers; Rob H J van der Lubbe; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The influence of visual motion on fast reaching movements to a stationary object.

Authors:  David Whitney; David A Westwood; Melvyn A Goodale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-06-19       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Abstraction from a sensori-motor perspective: can we get a quick hold on simple perception?

Authors:  Yves Rossetti
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2003-07-29       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  A distributed left hemisphere network active during planning of everyday tool use skills.

Authors:  Scott H Johnson-Frey; Roger Newman-Norlund; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-09-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Asymmetric Influence of Egocentric Representation onto Allocentric Perception.

Authors:  Yang Zhou; Yining Liu; Wangzikang Zhang; Mingsha Zhang
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Crossing the hands is more confusing for females than males.

Authors:  Michelle L Cadieux; Michael Barnett-Cowan; David I Shore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.