Literature DB >> 9136264

Object identification without foveal vision: evidence from an artificial scotoma paradigm.

J M Henderson1, K K McClure, S Pierce, G Schrock.   

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the degree to which foveal information is necessary for object identification. To explore this question, we used an artificial moving scotoma paradigm to eliminate a region of a currently viewed display in real time as a function of eye position. Subjects examined linear arrays of four line drawings of objects while their eye movements were recorded. Immediately following each array, a test probe was presented to test the degree to which the subject had identified those objects. Three conditions were compared, one in which a central foveal scotoma was created, one in which an extrafoveal scotoma was created, and a control condition in which the scotoma was absent. The main result was that identification accuracy was very good, but eye-movement behavior was disrupted when a foveal scotoma was present. These results suggest that foveal information is not necessary but is beneficial for perceptual encoding during object identification; the loss of foveal information can be overcome as long as compensatory extrafoveal processing is possible.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9136264     DOI: 10.3758/bf03211901

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  11 in total

1.  Change detection in the flicker paradigm: the role of fixation position within the scene.

Authors:  A Hollingworth; G Schrock; J M Henderson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-03

2.  Defining eye-fixation sequences across individuals and tasks: the Binocular-Individual Threshold (BIT) algorithm.

Authors:  Ralf van der Lans; Michel Wedel; Rik Pieters
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2011-03

3.  Stop before you saccade: Looking into an artificial peripheral scotoma.

Authors:  Christian P Janssen; Preeti Verghese
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 4.  The Impact of Visual Field Loss on Driving Skills: A Systematic Narrative Review.

Authors:  Gemma Patterson; Claire Howard; Lauren Hepworth; Fiona Rowe
Journal:  Br Ir Orthopt J       Date:  2019-04-16

5.  Exploring eye movements in patients with glaucoma when viewing a driving scene.

Authors:  David P Crabb; Nicholas D Smith; Franziska G Rauscher; Catharine M Chisholm; John L Barbur; David F Edgar; David F Garway-Heath
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Direct measurement of the system latency of gaze-contingent displays.

Authors:  Daniel R Saunders; Russell L Woods
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2014-06

7.  Effects of peripheral visual field loss on eye movements during visual search.

Authors:  Emily Wiecek; Louis R Pasquale; Jozsef Fiser; Steven Dakin; Peter J Bex
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-05

8.  Macular degeneration affects eye movement behavior during visual search.

Authors:  Stefan Van der Stigchel; Richard A I Bethlehem; Barrie P Klein; Tos T J M Berendschot; Tanja C W Nijboer; Serge O Dumoulin
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-09-03

9.  Saccade Landing Point Prediction Based on Fine-Grained Learning Method.

Authors:  Aythami Morales; Francisco M Costela; Russell L Woods
Journal:  IEEE Access       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 3.367

10.  Attentional Mechanisms during the Performance of a Subsecond Timing Task.

Authors:  Anna L Toscano-Zapién; Daniel Velázquez-López; David N Velázquez-Martínez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.