Literature DB >> 9136201

Asymmetry of respiratory sounds and thoracic transmission.

H Pasterkamp1, S Patel, G R Wodicka.   

Abstract

Breath sounds heard with a stethoscope over homologous sites of both lungs in healthy subjects are presumed to have similar characteristics. Passively transmitted sounds introduced at the mouth, however, are known to lateralise, with right-over-left dominance in power at the anterior upper chest. Both spontaneous breath sounds and passively transmitted sounds are studied in four healthy adults, using contact sensors at homologous sites on the anterior upper and posterior lower chest. At standardised air flow, breath sound intensity shows a right-over-left dominance at the anterior upper chest, similar to passively transmitted sounds. At the posterior lung base, breath sounds are louder on the left, with a trend to similar lateralisation in transmitted sounds. It is likely that the observed asymmetries are related to the effects of cardiovascular structures and airway geometry on sound generation and transmission.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9136201     DOI: 10.1007/bf02534138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  14 in total

1.  Digital respirosonography. New images of lung sounds.

Authors:  H Pasterkamp; C Carson; D Daien; Y Oh
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Chest surface mapping of lung sounds during methacholine challenge.

Authors:  H Pasterkamp; R Consunji-Araneta; Y Oh; J Holbrow
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  1997-01

3.  Transmission to the chest of sound introduced at the mouth.

Authors:  S S Kraman; A B Bohadana
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1989-01

4.  Measurement of respiratory acoustical signals. Comparison of sensors.

Authors:  H Pasterkamp; S S Kraman; P D DeFrain; G R Wodicka
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Bilateral asymmetry of respiratory acoustic transmission.

Authors:  G R Wodicka; P D DeFrain; S S Kraman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Measurement of respiratory acoustic signals. Effect of microphone air cavity depth.

Authors:  G R Wodicka; S S Kraman; G M Zenk; H Pasterkamp
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 9.410

7.  Comparison of lung sound and transmitted sound amplitude in normal men.

Authors:  S S Kraman; O Austrheim
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1983-09

8.  Lung sound intensity variability in normal men. A contour phonopneumographic study.

Authors:  R Dosani; S S Kraman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Determination of the site of production of respiratory sounds by subtraction phonopneumography.

Authors:  S S Kraman
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1980-08

10.  Vesicular lung sound amplitude mapping by automated flow-gated phonopneumography.

Authors:  D M O'Donnell; S S Kraman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1982-09
View more
  13 in total

1.  Effect of ambient respiratory noise on the measurement of lung sounds.

Authors:  H Pasterkamp; G R Wodicka; S S Kraman
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Computerised acoustical respiratory phase detection without airflow measurement.

Authors:  Z K Moussavi; M T Leopando; H Pasterkamp; G Rempel
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Respiratory acoustic thoracic imaging (RATHI): assessing deterministic interpolation techniques.

Authors:  S Charleston-Villalobos; S Cortés-Rubiano; R González-Camarena; G Chi-Lem; T Aljama-Corrales
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Computerised respiratory sounds can differentiate smokers and non-smokers.

Authors:  Ana Oliveira; Ipek Sen; Yasemin P Kahya; Vera Afreixo; Alda Marques
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2016-05-10       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  Breath sound changes associated with malpositioned endotracheal tubes.

Authors:  H A Mansy; C J O'Connor; R A Balk; R H Sandler
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.602

6.  Sound transmission in porcine thorax through airway insonification.

Authors:  Ying Peng; Zoujun Dai; Hansen A Mansy; Brian M Henry; Richard H Sandler; Robert A Balk; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 7.  Acoustic Methods for Pulmonary Diagnosis.

Authors:  Adam Rao; Emily Huynh; Thomas J Royston; Aaron Kornblith; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-10-29

8.  Reproducibility of dynamically represented acoustic lung images from healthy individuals.

Authors:  T M Maher; M Gat; D Allen; A Devaraj; A U Wells; D M Geddes
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 9.139

9.  Effect of airflow rate on vibration response imaging in normal lungs.

Authors:  Meirav Yosef; Ruben Langer; Shaul Lev; Yael A Glickman
Journal:  Open Respir Med J       Date:  2009-09-17

10.  Evaluation of Vibration Response Imaging (VRI) Technique and Difference in VRI Indices Among Non-Smokers, Active Smokers and Passive Smokers.

Authors:  Hongying Jiang; Jichao Chen; Jinying Cao; Lan Mu; Zhenyu Hu; Jian He
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-07-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.