Literature DB >> 15503962

Respiratory acoustic thoracic imaging (RATHI): assessing deterministic interpolation techniques.

S Charleston-Villalobos1, S Cortés-Rubiano, R González-Camarena, G Chi-Lem, T Aljama-Corrales.   

Abstract

As respiratory sounds contain mechanical and clinical pulmonary information, technical efforts have been devoted during the past decades to analysing, processing and visualising them. The aim of this work was to evaluate deterministic interpolating functions to generate surface respiratory acoustic thoracic images (RATHIs), based on multiple acoustic sensors. Lung sounds were acquired from healthy subjects through a 5 x 5 microphone array on the anterior and posterior thoracic surfaces. The performance of five interpolating functions, including the linear, cubic spline, Hermite, Lagrange and nearest neighbour method, were evaluated to produce images of lung sound intensity during both breathing phases, at low (approximately 0.5ls(-1)) and high (approximately 1.0ls(-1)) airflows. Performance indexes included the normalised residual variance nrv (i.e. inaccuracy), the prediction covariance cv (i.e. precision), the residual covariance rcv (i.e. bias) and the maximum squared residual error semax (i.e. tolerance). Among the tested interpolating functions and in all experimental conditions, the Hermite function (nrv=0.146 +/- 0.059, cv= 0.925 +/- 0.030, rcv = -0.073 +/- 0.068, semax = 0.005 +/- 0.004) globally provided the indexes closest to the optimum, whereas the nearest neighbour (nrv=0.339 +/- 0.023, cv = 0.870 +/- 0.033, rcv= 0.298 +/- 0.032, semax = 0.007 +/- 0.005) and the Lagrange methods (nrv = 0.287 +/- 0.148, cv = 0.880 +/- 0.039, rcv = -0.524 +/- 0.135, semax = 0.007 +/- 0.0001) presented the poorest statistical measurements. It is concluded that, although deterministic interpolation functions indicate different performances among tested techniques, the Hermite interpolation function presents a more confident deterministic interpolation for depicting surface-type RATHI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15503962     DOI: 10.1007/bf02347543

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  26 in total

1.  Survey: interpolation methods in medical image processing.

Authors:  T M Lehmann; C Gönner; K Spitzer
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Phonospirometry for noninvasive measurement of ventilation: methodology and preliminary results.

Authors:  Cheng-Li Que; Christof Kolmaga; Louis-Gilles Durand; Suzanne M Kelly; Peter T Macklem
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2002-10

3.  Breath sounds and regional ventilation.

Authors:  Y Ploy-Song-Sang; R R Martin; W R Ross; R G Loudon; P T Macklem
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1977-08

4.  Asymmetry of respiratory sounds and thoracic transmission.

Authors:  H Pasterkamp; S Patel; G R Wodicka
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 2.602

5.  Scalp current density mapping: value and estimation from potential data.

Authors:  F Perrin; O Bertrand; J Pernier
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 4.538

6.  Breath sounds and distribution of pulmonary ventilation.

Authors:  P Leblanc; P T Macklem; W R Ross
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1970-07

7.  Lung sound intensity variability in normal men. A contour phonopneumographic study.

Authors:  R Dosani; S S Kraman
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Determination of the site of production of respiratory sounds by subtraction phonopneumography.

Authors:  S S Kraman
Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis       Date:  1980-08

9.  An objective comparison of 3-D image interpolation methods.

Authors:  G J Grevera; J K Udupa
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 10.048

10.  Vesicular lung sound amplitude mapping by automated flow-gated phonopneumography.

Authors:  D M O'Donnell; S S Kraman
Journal:  J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol       Date:  1982-09
View more
  10 in total

1.  Acoustic thoracic image of crackle sounds using linear and nonlinear processing techniques.

Authors:  Sonia Charleston-Villalobos; Guadalupe Dorantes-Méndez; Ramón González-Camarena; Georgina Chi-Lem; José G Carrillo; Tomás Aljama-Corrales
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Experimental and Computational Models for Simulating Sound Propagation Within the Lungs.

Authors:  S Acikgoz; M B Ozer; T J Royston; H A Mansy; R H Sandler
Journal:  J Vib Acoust       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.583

3.  A comprehensive computational model of sound transmission through the porcine lung.

Authors:  Zoujun Dai; Ying Peng; Brian M Henry; Hansen A Mansy; Richard H Sandler; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Comparison of Poroviscoelastic Models for Sound and Vibration in the Lungs.

Authors:  Zoujun Dai; Ying Peng; Hansen A Mansy; Richard H Sandler; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  J Vib Acoust       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 1.583

5.  Localization of adventitious respiratory sounds.

Authors:  Brian Henry; Thomas J Royston
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Contributions of signal analysis to the interpretation of spirometry.

Authors:  A Anogeianaki; N Negrev; G Ilonidis
Journal:  Hippokratia       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 0.471

Review 7.  Acoustic Methods for Pulmonary Diagnosis.

Authors:  Adam Rao; Emily Huynh; Thomas J Royston; Aaron Kornblith; Shuvo Roy
Journal:  IEEE Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2018-10-29

8.  Effect of airflow rate on vibration response imaging in normal lungs.

Authors:  Meirav Yosef; Ruben Langer; Shaul Lev; Yael A Glickman
Journal:  Open Respir Med J       Date:  2009-09-17

9.  Assessment of regional ventilation distribution: comparison of vibration response imaging (VRI) with electrical impedance tomography (EIT).

Authors:  Chang Shi; Stefan Boehme; Alexander H Bentley; Erik K Hartmann; Klaus U Klein; Marc Bodenstein; James E Baumgardner; Matthias David; Roman Ullrich; Klaus Markstaller
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Vibration response imaging: protocol for a systematic review.

Authors:  Marc P Berry; Luigi Camporota; George Ntoumenopoulos
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2013-09-25
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.