Literature DB >> 9134792

Psychometric properties of the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in a sample of women in middle life.

R G Knight1, S Williams, R McGee, S Olaman.   

Abstract

The Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) was completed by 675 women taking part in a longitudinal investigation of health-related issues. The data were submitted to confirmatory factor analysis using LISREL 7 and a 4-factor model was found to fit the data moderately well. A second-order depression factor was also identified. The results provide support for the construct validity of the total and subscale scores from this measure. The scale was found to have good reliability. Evidence was found that scores on the subscale measuring somatic features of depression may be inflated in women who have experienced a chronic health problem in the past 12 months.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9134792     DOI: 10.1016/s0005-7967(96)00107-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Ther        ISSN: 0005-7967


  99 in total

1.  Psychometric characteristics of the General Well-Being Schedule (GWB) with African-American women.

Authors:  J E Taylor; W S Carlos Poston; C Keith Haddock; G L Blackburn; D Heber; S B Heymsfield; J P Foreyt
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Trajectories of maltreatment re-reports from ages 4 to 12:: evidence for persistent risk after early exposure.

Authors:  Laura J Proctor; Gregory A Aarons; Howard Dubowitz; Diana J English; Terri Lewis; Richard Thompson; Jon M Hussey; Alan J Litrownik; Scott C Roesch
Journal:  Child Maltreat       Date:  2012-06-20

3.  Higher maternal prenatal cortisol and younger age predict greater infant reactivity to novelty at 4 months: an observation-based study.

Authors:  Elizabeth Werner; Yihong Zhao; Lynn Evans; Michael Kinsella; Laura Kurzius; Arman Altincatal; Laraine McDonough; Catherine Monk
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 3.038

4.  Predictors of emotional well-being in at-risk adolescent girls: developing preventive intervention strategies.

Authors:  Mary I Armstrong; Roger A Boothroyd
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02-10       Impact factor: 1.505

5.  Behavioral symptoms of dementia: a dyadic effect of caregivers' stress process?

Authors:  Judy L M Campbell; Meredeth A Rowe; Michael Marsiske
Journal:  Res Gerontol Nurs       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 1.571

6.  Untangling the disaster-depression knot: The role of social ties after Deepwater Horizon.

Authors:  Ariane L Rung; Symielle Gaston; William T Robinson; Edward J Trapido; Edward S Peters
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.634

7.  Empowering survivors after colorectal and lung cancer treatment: Pilot study of a Self-Management Survivorship Care Planning intervention.

Authors:  Anne Reb; Nora Ruel; Marwan Fakih; Lily Lai; Ravi Salgia; Betty Ferrell; Sagus Sampath; Jae Y Kim; Dan J Raz; Virginia Sun
Journal:  Eur J Oncol Nurs       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 2.398

8.  Trajectories of maternal depressive symptoms over her child's life span: relation to adrenocortical, cardiovascular, and emotional functioning in children.

Authors:  Brooks B Gump; Jacki Reihman; Paul Stewart; Ed Lonky; Tom Darvill; Douglas A Granger; Karen A Matthews
Journal:  Dev Psychopathol       Date:  2009

9.  Patient-Reported Outcomes Predict Mortality in Lupus.

Authors:  Desiree R Azizoddin; Meenakshi Jolly; Shilpa Arora; Ed Yelin; Patricia Katz
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 4.794

10.  Detection of altered hippocampal morphology in multiple sclerosis-associated depression using automated surface mesh modeling.

Authors:  Stefan M Gold; Mary-Frances O'Connor; Raja Gill; Kyle C Kern; Yonggang Shi; Roland G Henry; Daniel Pelletier; David C Mohr; Nancy L Sicotte
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-07-30       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.