Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Towards the development of a standard test procedure for mouthguard assessment.

Literature DB >> 9132208

Towards the development of a standard test procedure for mouthguard assessment.

Abstract

A simulated upper jaw, made from a rubber arch containing replaceable ceramic teeth and a renewable composite jawbone, offers promise in assessing the performance of custom made mouthguard designs. Impact tests, involving precise assessment of jaw and tooth fractures caused by projectiles of various energies and profiles, simulate conditions that approximate to common clinical observation. Such conditions offer the most sensitive indices for assessing both improved mouthguard designs and product quality and reliability. Damage caused by the dissipation of the impact energy may be transferred within this simulated oral cavity by minor changes to the impact conditions.

Entities: Disease

Mesh：

Year: 1997 PMID： 9132208 PMCID： PMC1332470 DOI： 10.1136/bjsm.31.1.31

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Sports Med ISSN： 0306-3674 Impact factor: 13.800

7 in total

1. Custom-fitted protective mouthguards.

Authors: T P Croll
Journal: J Esthet Dent Date: 1992 Sep-Oct

2. A laminating procedure for thermoformed mouthguards.

Authors: P J Milward; R G Jagger
Journal: J Prosthet Dent Date: 1992-11 Impact factor: 3.426

Review 3. A review of dental injuries and the use of mouthguards in contact team sports.

Authors: J Scott; F J Burke; D C Watts
Journal: Br Dent J Date: 1994-04-23 Impact factor: 1.626

4. Comparative evaluation of college football officials' attitudes toward NCAA mouthguard regulations and player compliance.

Authors: D M Lancaster; D N Ranalli
Journal: Pediatr Dent Date: 1993 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.874

5. Comparing comfort and wearability: custom-made vs. self-adapted mouthguards.

Authors: A K DeYoung; E Robinson; W C Godwin
Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 1994-08 Impact factor: 3.634

6. Improving mouth guards.

Authors: J B Park; K L Shaull; B Overton; K J Donly
Journal: J Prosthet Dent Date: 1994-10 Impact factor: 3.426

7. Attitudes to mouthguards and prevalence of orofacial injuries in four teams competing at the second Rugby World Cup.

Authors: P J Chapman; B P Nasser
Journal: Br J Sports Med Date: 1993-09 Impact factor: 13.800

7 in total

6 in total

6. Wearability and preference of mouthguard during sport in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors: Aneesh Kalra; Claire Harrington; Gursharan Minhas; Spyridon N Papageorgiou; Martyn T Cobourne
Journal: Eur J Orthod Date: 2022-01-25 Impact factor: 3.075

6 in total

Towards the development of a standard test procedure for mouthguard assessment.

1. Custom-fitted protective mouthguards.

2. A laminating procedure for thermoformed mouthguards.

Review 3. A review of dental injuries and the use of mouthguards in contact team sports.

4. Comparative evaluation of college football officials' attitudes toward NCAA mouthguard regulations and player compliance.

5. Comparing comfort and wearability: custom-made vs. self-adapted mouthguards.

6. Improving mouth guards.

7. Attitudes to mouthguards and prevalence of orofacial injuries in four teams competing at the second Rugby World Cup.

1. Transient forces generated by projectiles on variable quality mouthguards monitored by instrumented impact testing.

Review 2. Scale of protection and the various types of sports mouthguard.

3. Application of a standard test to the in vitro performance of mouthguards.

Review 4. Mouthguards in sport activities : history, physical properties and injury prevention effectiveness.

5. What are the differences in protective characteristics of orthodontic mouthguards? An in vitro study.

6. Wearability and preference of mouthguard during sport in patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances: a randomized clinical trial.