D G Patrick1, R van Noort, M S Found. 1. University of Sheffield, Department of Oral Health and Development, School of Clinical Dentistry, Claremont Crescent, Sheffield S10 2TA, UK. d.g.Patrick@sheffield.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To present a grading system of the protection offered by various types of mouthguard, together with an indication of associated risks, in order to make athletes aware of the consequences of improper or no mouth protection. METHODS: A review of the literature on mouthguards, mouthguard materials, and novel laminates for mouthguards was carried out as it was apparent that information on mouthguards was lacking. Studies on stock (or unfitted) mouthguards, mouth formed (boil and bite) mouthguards, and custom mouthguards are reviewed. RESULTS: A scale of protection offered by various mouthguards and novel laminates has been produced, where 0 indicates no mouthguard and 10 indicates a custom made mouthguard offering excellent protection. CONCLUSIONS: From work carried out on laminates and the manufacturing processes of mouthguards, it became apparent that information was lacking to enable athletes make informed decisions about the best oral protection for their chosen sport.
OBJECTIVES: To present a grading system of the protection offered by various types of mouthguard, together with an indication of associated risks, in order to make athletes aware of the consequences of improper or no mouth protection. METHODS: A review of the literature on mouthguards, mouthguard materials, and novel laminates for mouthguards was carried out as it was apparent that information on mouthguards was lacking. Studies on stock (or unfitted) mouthguards, mouth formed (boil and bite) mouthguards, and custom mouthguards are reviewed. RESULTS: A scale of protection offered by various mouthguards and novel laminates has been produced, where 0 indicates no mouthguard and 10 indicates a custom made mouthguard offering excellent protection. CONCLUSIONS: From work carried out on laminates and the manufacturing processes of mouthguards, it became apparent that information was lacking to enable athletes make informed decisions about the best oral protection for their chosen sport.
Authors: Joseph J Knapik; Stephen W Marshall; Robyn B Lee; Salima S Darakjy; Sarah B Jones; Timothy A Mitchener; Georgia G delaCruz; Bruce H Jones Journal: Sports Med Date: 2007 Impact factor: 11.136
Authors: Richard T Glass; Robert S Conrad; Charles Rieger Wood; Aric J Warren; Gerwald A Kohler; James W Bullard; Gifty Benson; Judyth M Gulden Journal: Sports Health Date: 2009-09 Impact factor: 3.843
Authors: Taciana Marco Ferraz Caneppele; Alessandra B Borges; Daniele Masterson Pereira; Alessandra Almeida Fagundes; Tatiane K S Fidalgo; Luciane C Maia Journal: Sports Med Int Open Date: 2017-09-15
Authors: Adrià Miró; Bernat Buscà; Joan Aguilera-Castells; Jordi Arboix-Alió Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-28 Impact factor: 3.390