Literature DB >> 9128949

The biological effectiveness of intermittent irradiation as a function of overall treatment time: development of correction factors for linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy.

S H Benedict1, P S Lin, R D Zwicker, D T Huang, R K Schmidt-Ullrich.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Continuous irradiation of relatively short duration as administered in gamma-ray stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is biologically not equivalent to the more protracted intermittent exposures during accelerator-based radiosurgery with multiple arcs. Accelerator-based SRS and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is currently performed with a high degree of variability in equipment and techniques resulting in highly variable treatment delivery times. The present work is designed to quantify the effects of radiation delivery times on biological effectiveness. For this, the intermittent radiation delivery schemes, typical for linac-based SRS/SRT, have been simulated in vitro to derive biological correction factors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The experiments were carried out using U-87MG human glioma cells in suspension at 37 degrees C irradiated with 6 MV X-rays to clinically relevant doses ranging from 6 to 18 Gy, delivered over total irradiation times from 16 min to 3 h. The resulting cell survival data was used to calculate dose correction factors to compensate for wide variations in dose delivery times.
RESULTS: At each total dose level, cell survival increased with increasing total irradiation time. The increase in survival was more pronounced at higher dose levels. At a total dose of 12 Gy, cell survival increased by a factor of 4.7 when irradiation time was increased from 16 to 112 min. Dose correction factors were calculated to allow biologically equivalent irradiations over the range of exposure times. Cells irradiated with corrected total doses of 11.5 Gy delivered incrementally in 16 min up to 13.3 Gy in 112 min were found to exhibit the same survival within the experimental limits of accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: For a given total dose, variations in dose delivery time typical of SRS/SRT techniques will result in significant changes in cell survival. In the dose range studied, an isoeffect dose correction factor of 2 to 3 cGy/min was shown to compensate for the change in delivery time for U-87 MG human gloma cells in vitro.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9128949     DOI: 10.1016/s0360-3016(97)00023-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  10 in total

1.  In vitro effects of Cyberknife-driven intermittent irradiation on glioblastoma cell lines.

Authors:  Alessandra Canazza; Ugo De Grazia; Luisa Fumagalli; Lorenzo Brait; Francesco Ghielmetti; Laura Fariselli; Danilo Croci; Andrea Salmaggi; Emilio Ciusani
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  CyberKnife robotic image-guided stereotactic radiotherapy for oligometastic cancer : A prospective evaluation of 95 patients/118 lesions.

Authors:  B A Jereczek-Fossa; I Bossi-Zanetti; R Mauro; G Beltramo; L Fariselli; L C Bianchi; C Fodor; P Fossati; G Baroni; R Orecchia
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2013-04-21       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  Dose compensation based on biological effectiveness due to interruption time for photon radiation therapy.

Authors:  Daisuke Kawahara; Hisashi Nakano; Akito Saito; Shuichi Ozawa; Yasushi Nagata
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  The in vivo study on the radiobiologic effect of prolonged delivery time to tumor control in C57BL mice implanted with Lewis lung cancer.

Authors:  Xin Wang; Xiao-Peng Xiong; Jiade Lu; Guo-Pei Zhu; Shao-Qin He; Chao-Su Hu; Hong-Mei Ying
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.481

5.  Quantification of the In Vitro Radiosensitivity of Mung Bean Sprout Elongation to 6MV X-Ray: A Revised Target Model Study.

Authors:  Tzu Hwei Wang; Samrit Kittipayak; Yu Ting Lin; Cheng Hsun Lin; Lung Kwang Pan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Impact of Prolonged Fraction Delivery Time Modelling Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy with High Dose Hypofractionation on the Killing of Cultured ACHN Renal Cell Carcinoma Cell Line.

Authors:  M Khorramizadeh; A Saberi; Ma Tahmasebi-Birgani; P Shokrani; A Amouhedari
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2017-09-01

7.  Single-fraction spine SBRT end-to-end testing on TomoTherapy, Vero, TrueBeam, and CyberKnife treatment platforms using a novel anthropomorphic phantom.

Authors:  John J Gallo; Isaac Kaufman; Rachel Powell; Shalini Pandya; Archana Somnay; Todd Bossenberger; Ezequiel Ramirez; Robert Reynolds; Timothy Solberg; Jay Burmeister
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Flattening filter-free accelerators: a report from the AAPM Therapy Emerging Technology Assessment Work Group.

Authors:  Ying Xiao; Stephen F Kry; Richard Popple; Ellen Yorke; Niko Papanikolaou; Sotirios Stathakis; Ping Xia; Saiful Huq; John Bayouth; James Galvin; Fang-Fang Yin
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.102

9.  Lung Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) dose gradient and PTV volume: a retrospective multi-center analysis.

Authors:  David Hoffman; Irena Dragojević; Jeremy Hoisak; David Hoopes; Ryan Manger
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-09-03       Impact factor: 3.481

Review 10.  Radiobiology of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy: what are the optimal fractionation schedules?

Authors:  Yuta Shibamoto; Akifumi Miyakawa; Shinya Otsuka; Hiromitsu Iwata
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 2.724

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.