PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of robotic CyberKnife (Accuray Inc. Sunnyvale, USA)-based stereotactic radiotherapy (CBK-SRT) for oligometastic cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 2007 and December 2009, 95 patients with a total of 118 lesions underwent CBK-SRT (median dose 24 Gy in 3 fractions). INCLUSION CRITERIA: adult patients with limited volume cancer; suitability for SRT but not for other local therapies. Primary diagnoses included breast, lung, head and neck, gastrointestinal and other malignancies. Prostate cancer patients were excluded. Concomitant systemic therapy was given in 40 % of cases and median follow-up was 12 months. Toxicity and tumor response were evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC) Scale and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors RECIST. RESULTS: Toxicity was rare and observed mainly in patients with comorbidities or uncontrolled cancer. Out of 87 evaluable lesions, complete radiological response, partial response, stabilization and progressive disease were observed in 15 (17 %), 25 (29 %), 34 (39 %) and 13 (15 %) lesions, respectively. Upon restricting the analysis to lesions treated with CBK-SRT alone (no concomitant therapy), response- and local control (LC) rates remained similar. Actuarial 3-year in-field progression-free survival- (i.e. LC), progression-free survival- (PFS) and overall-survival (OS) rates were 67.6, 18.4, and 31.2 %, respectively. LC was reduced in cases of early recurrence. OS- and cause-specific survival (CSS) rates were significantly lower in patients treated for visceral lesions. Failures were predominantly out-field. CONCLUSION: CBK-SRT is a feasible therapeutic approach for oligometastastic cancer patients that provides long-term in-field tumor control with a low toxicity profile. Further investigations should focus on dose escalation and optimization of the combination with systemic therapies.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcome of robotic CyberKnife (Accuray Inc. Sunnyvale, USA)-based stereotactic radiotherapy (CBK-SRT) for oligometastic cancerpatients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between May 2007 and December 2009, 95 patients with a total of 118 lesions underwent CBK-SRT (median dose 24 Gy in 3 fractions). INCLUSION CRITERIA: adult patients with limited volume cancer; suitability for SRT but not for other local therapies. Primary diagnoses included breast, lung, head and neck, gastrointestinal and other malignancies. Prostate cancerpatients were excluded. Concomitant systemic therapy was given in 40 % of cases and median follow-up was 12 months. Toxicity and tumor response were evaluated using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (RTOG/EORTC) Scale and Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors RECIST. RESULTS:Toxicity was rare and observed mainly in patients with comorbidities or uncontrolled cancer. Out of 87 evaluable lesions, complete radiological response, partial response, stabilization and progressive disease were observed in 15 (17 %), 25 (29 %), 34 (39 %) and 13 (15 %) lesions, respectively. Upon restricting the analysis to lesions treated with CBK-SRT alone (no concomitant therapy), response- and local control (LC) rates remained similar. Actuarial 3-year in-field progression-free survival- (i.e. LC), progression-free survival- (PFS) and overall-survival (OS) rates were 67.6, 18.4, and 31.2 %, respectively. LC was reduced in cases of early recurrence. OS- and cause-specific survival (CSS) rates were significantly lower in patients treated for visceral lesions. Failures were predominantly out-field. CONCLUSION: CBK-SRT is a feasible therapeutic approach for oligometastastic cancerpatients that provides long-term in-field tumor control with a low toxicity profile. Further investigations should focus on dose escalation and optimization of the combination with systemic therapies.
Authors: A Zabel-du Bois; S Milker-Zabel; M Henzel; W Popp; J Debus; H Sack; R Engenhart-Cabillic Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2012-08-01 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Marsha L Haley; Peter C Gerszten; Dwight E Heron; Yue-Fang Chang; Dave S Atteberry; Steven A Burton Journal: J Neurosurg Spine Date: 2011-02-11
Authors: Joseph K Salama; Michael D Hasselle; Steven J Chmura; Renuka Malik; Neil Mehta; Kamil M Yenice; Victoria M Villaflor; Walter M Stadler; Philip C Hoffman; Ezra E W Cohen; Philip P Connell; Daniel J Haraf; Everett E Vokes; Samuel Hellman; Ralph R Weichselbaum Journal: Cancer Date: 2011-10-21 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Beant Gill; Eric Oermann; Andrew Ju; Simeng Suy; Xia Yu; Jennifer Rabin; Christopher Kalhorn; Mani N Nair; Jean-Marc Voyadzis; Keith Unger; Sean P Collins; K W Harter; Brian T Collins Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 6.244
Authors: R Orecchia; A Surgo; M Muto; A Ferrari; G Piperno; M A Gerardi; S Comi; C Garibaldi; D Ciardo; A Bazani; F Golino; F Pansini; C Fodor; P Romanelli; D Maestri; V Scroffi; S Mazza; B A Jereczek-Fossa Journal: Ecancermedicalscience Date: 2016-09-29