Literature DB >> 9128940

European collaborative research on mosaicism in CVS (EUCROMIC)--fetal and extrafetal cell lineages in 192 gestations with CVS mosaicism involving single autosomal trisomy.

J M Hahnemann1, L O Vejerslev.   

Abstract

Cytogenetic information on cells from cytotrophoblast, villus mesenchyme, and one or more fetal tissues was available for 192 gestations with mosaicism or non-mosaic fetoplacental discrepancy involving a single autosomal trisomy in the chorionic villus sample (CVS), registered in a collaborative study (EUCROMIC) during the period 1986-1994. In order to identify predictors of confined placental mosaicism (CPM), generalized mosaicism and/or uniparental disomy (UPD), distribution of the mosaic and nonmosaic aneuploid cell lines in the different fetal and extrafetal cell lineages were analyzed. Data were related to existing hypotheses on mechanisms leading to fetoplacental discrepancies and early extraembryonic cell differentiation. Trisomy 21 mosaicism was the one most frequently confirmed in the fetus. Non-mosaic trisomy 13, 18, and 21 in the villus mesenchyme indicated the presence of a trisomic cell line in the fetus proper. Non-mosaic trisomy 2, 7, and 16 in villus mesenchyme was always found with concomitant mosaic or non-mosaic trisomy in the cytotrophoblast, but was never recovered in the fetus. Mosaic trisomy 3, 7, and 20 was predominantly restricted to the cytotrophoblast, mosaic trisomy 2 to the villus mesenchyme. Trisomies 15 and 16 were most often found in both cytotrophoblast and villus mesenchyme and not in fetal cells. This supports the hypothesis that mosaicism/discrepancy for trisomies 15 and 16 results more often than for the other trisomies from trisomic zygote rescue, enhancing their risk for UPD. We recommend, due to the risk of fetal trisomy, amniocentesis in all gestations involving mosaic autosomal trisomy in villus mesenchyme. In gestations with mosaic or non-mosaic autosomal trisomy in both cytotrophoblast and villus mesenchyme we recommend, in order to exclude fetal trisomy and/or UPD, depending on the chromosome involved, further examination by amniocentesis, ultrasound and/or test for UPD. We also recommend, due to a small but not negligible risk of false negative and false positive diagnoses, not to solely use direct preparation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9128940     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(19970516)70:2<179::aid-ajmg15>3.0.co;2-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet        ISSN: 0148-7299


  23 in total

Review 1.  Confined placental mosaicism and intrauterine fetal growth.

Authors:  V S Lestou; D K Kalousek
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Inducing segmental aneuploid mosaicism in the mouse through targeted asymmetric sister chromatid event of recombination.

Authors:  Arnaud Duchon; Vanessa Besson; Patricia Lopes Pereira; Laetitia Magnol; Yann Hérault
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2008-08-30       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Noninvasive prenatal testing using a novel analysis pipeline to screen for all autosomal fetal aneuploidies improves pregnancy management.

Authors:  Baran Bayindir; Luc Dehaspe; Nathalie Brison; Paul Brady; Simon Ardui; Molka Kammoun; Lars Van der Veken; Klaske Lichtenbelt; Kris Van den Bogaert; Jeroen Van Houdt; Hilde Peeters; Hilde Van Esch; Thomy de Ravel; Eric Legius; Koen Devriendt; Joris R Vermeesch
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 4.  Constitutional and acquired autosomal aneuploidy.

Authors:  Colleen Jackson-Cook
Journal:  Clin Lab Med       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.935

Review 5.  Benefits and limitations of prenatal screening for Prader-Willi syndrome.

Authors:  Merlin G Butler
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2016-10-12       Impact factor: 3.050

Review 6.  From contemplation to classification of chromosomal mosaicism in human preimplantation embryos.

Authors:  Igor N Lebedev; Daria I Zhigalina
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  An analysis of common isodisomic regions in five mUPD 16 probands.

Authors:  S N Abu-Amero; Z Ali; K K Abu-Amero; P Stanier; G E Moore
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 6.318

8.  Single Nucleotide Polymorphism-Based Analysis of Cell-Free Fetal DNA in 3000 Cases from Germany and Austria.

Authors:  B Eiben; M Krapp; H Borth; N Kutur; P Kreiselmaier; R Glaubitz; J Deutinger; E Merz
Journal:  Ultrasound Int Open       Date:  2015-06-26

9.  Diagnostic cytogenetic testing following positive noninvasive prenatal screening results: a clinical laboratory practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).

Authors:  Athena M Cherry; Yassmine M Akkari; Kimberly M Barr; Hutton M Kearney; Nancy C Rose; Sarah T South; James H Tepperberg; Jeanne M Meck
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  Genome-wide cfDNA screening: clinical laboratory experience with the first 10,000 cases.

Authors:  Mathias Ehrich; John Tynan; Amin Mazloom; Eyad Almasri; Ron McCullough; Theresa Boomer; Daniel Grosu; Jason Chibuk
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2017-06-15       Impact factor: 8.822

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.