N Glossop1, R Hu. 1. Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: In vitro and in vivo assessment of the accuracy of devices proposed for tracking spine motion during surgery; in vivo assessment of vertebral motion during spine surgery. OBJECTIVES: 1) To quantify the accuracy of newly designed vertebral body trackers; 2) to demonstrate the feasibility of tracking vertebral motion in a cadaveric model; and 3) to quantify the vertebral motion that occurs during spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Computer techniques are beginning to be applied to spine surgery. Validation of accuracy of methods of spinal tracking has not been reported. No information exists on the amount of vertebral motion that occurs during surgery. Because the new techniques require accurate positional information for the vertebral body, it is important to understand and evaluate methods of tracking vertebrae. METHODS: An optical tracking system (Northern Digital, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) was used to track custom-designed trackers. The reliability and accuracy of the trackers were evaluated in vitro. The proposed tracking methodology for human testing was performed using a cadaveric model, and after successful completion, human testing was done in the operating room to evaluate the motion of two vertebral bodies during exposure for instrumentation of the lumbar spine. This technique was used to evaluate the custom designed trackers effectiveness for tracking vertebral bodies for pedicle screw insertion. RESULTS: The trackers developed were accurate and capable of tracking the motion of the spine. Measured motion of L3 and L4 during breathing was 1.3 mm, peak to peak. Maximal intraoperative motion of the vertebral bodies was 12.3 mm during maneuvers simulating dissection of soft tissue and targeting of spinal pedicles. CONCLUSIONS: Significant motion occurs in lumbar vertebral bodies during surgery. Breathing motion alone is up to 1.3 mm, and surgeon-induced motion up to 10 times greater. Vertebral body trackers for use with an optical position sensor were capable of measuring this motion.
STUDY DESIGN: In vitro and in vivo assessment of the accuracy of devices proposed for tracking spine motion during surgery; in vivo assessment of vertebral motion during spine surgery. OBJECTIVES: 1) To quantify the accuracy of newly designed vertebral body trackers; 2) to demonstrate the feasibility of tracking vertebral motion in a cadaveric model; and 3) to quantify the vertebral motion that occurs during spinal surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Computer techniques are beginning to be applied to spine surgery. Validation of accuracy of methods of spinal tracking has not been reported. No information exists on the amount of vertebral motion that occurs during surgery. Because the new techniques require accurate positional information for the vertebral body, it is important to understand and evaluate methods of tracking vertebrae. METHODS: An optical tracking system (Northern Digital, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada) was used to track custom-designed trackers. The reliability and accuracy of the trackers were evaluated in vitro. The proposed tracking methodology for human testing was performed using a cadaveric model, and after successful completion, human testing was done in the operating room to evaluate the motion of two vertebral bodies during exposure for instrumentation of the lumbar spine. This technique was used to evaluate the custom designed trackers effectiveness for tracking vertebral bodies for pedicle screw insertion. RESULTS: The trackers developed were accurate and capable of tracking the motion of the spine. Measured motion of L3 and L4 during breathing was 1.3 mm, peak to peak. Maximal intraoperative motion of the vertebral bodies was 12.3 mm during maneuvers simulating dissection of soft tissue and targeting of spinal pedicles. CONCLUSIONS: Significant motion occurs in lumbar vertebral bodies during surgery. Breathing motion alone is up to 1.3 mm, and surgeon-induced motion up to 10 times greater. Vertebral body trackers for use with an optical position sensor were capable of measuring this motion.
Authors: Charles X B Yan; Benoît Goulet; Julie Pelletier; Sean Jy-Shyang Chen; Donatella Tampieri; D Louis Collins Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2010-10-26 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: J-S Jarvers; S Katscher; A Franck; S Glasmacher; C Schmidt; T Blattert; C Josten Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2011-04-01 Impact factor: 3.693
Authors: Daipayan Guha; Raphael Jakubovic; Shaurya Gupta; Michael G Fehlings; Todd G Mainprize; Albert Yee; Victor X D Yang Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2018-10-09