Literature DB >> 9124855

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: emergence of multidrug-resistant strains during therapy and in an in vitro pharmacodynamic chamber model.

M W Garrison1, D E Anderson, D M Campbell, K C Carroll, C L Malone, J D Anderson, R J Hollis, M A Pfaller.   

Abstract

Emergence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as a nosocomial pathogen is becoming increasingly apparent. Pleiotropic resistance characterizes S. maltophilia. Furthermore, a slow growth rate and an increased mutation rate generate discordance between in vitro susceptibility testing and clinical outcome. Despite original susceptibility, drug-resistant strains of S. maltophilia are often recovered from patients receiving beta-lactams, quinolones, or aminoglycosides. Given the disparity among various in vitro susceptibility methods, this study incorporated a unique pharmacodynamic model to more accurately characterize the bacterial time-kill curves and mutation rates of four clinical isolates of S. maltophilia following exposure to simulated multidose regimens of ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and ticarcillin-clavulanate. Time-kill data demonstrated regrowth of S. maltophilia with all four agents. With the exception of ticarcillin-clavulanate, viable bacterial counts at the end of 24 h exceeded the starting inoculum. Ciprofloxacin only reduced bacterial counts by less than 1.0 log prior to rapid bacterial regrowth. Resistant mutant strains, identical to their parent strain by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, were observed following exposure to each class of antibiotic. Mutant strains also had distinct susceptibility patterns. These data are consistent with previous reports which suggest that S. maltophilia, despite susceptibility data that imply that the organism is sensitive, develops multiple forms of resistance quickly and against several classes of antimicrobial agents. Standard in vitro susceptibility methods are not completely reliable for detecting resistant S. maltophilia strains; and therefore, interpretation of these results should be done with caution. In vivo studies are needed to determine optimal therapy against S. maltophilia infections.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9124855      PMCID: PMC163636     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  21 in total

1.  Nosocomial infections due to Xanthomonas maltophilia (Pseudomonas maltophilia) in patients with cancer.

Authors:  N Khardori; L Elting; E Wong; B Schable; G P Bodey
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1990 Nov-Dec

2.  Discrepancies between disk diffusion and broth susceptibility studies of the activity of ticarcillin plus clavulanic acid against ticarcillin-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  F A Manian; R H Alford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Nosocomial infection caused by Xanthomonas maltophilia: a case-control study of predisposing factors.

Authors:  L S Elting; N Khardori; G P Bodey; V Fainstein
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Outer membrane permeability and beta-lactamase content in Pseudomonas maltophilia clinical isolates and laboratory mutants.

Authors:  H Mett; S Rosta; B Schacher; R Frei
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1988 Jul-Aug

5.  Type I beta-lactamases of gram-negative bacteria: interactions with beta-lactam antibiotics.

Authors:  C C Sanders; W E Sanders
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Resistance to ticarcillin-potassium clavulanate among clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae: role of PSE-1 beta-lactamase and high levels of TEM-1 and SHV-1 and problems with false susceptibility in disk diffusion tests.

Authors:  C C Sanders; J P Iaconis; G P Bodey; G Samonis
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 5.191

7.  Susceptibility of Pseudomonas maltophilia to antimicrobial agents, singly and in combination.

Authors:  T P Felegie; V L Yu; L W Rumans; R B Yee
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative in vitro activities of newer quinolones against Pseudomonas species and Xanthomonas maltophilia isolated from patients with cancer.

Authors:  K V Rolston; M Messer; D H Ho
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 9.  Xanthomonas maltophilia: an emerging nosocomial pathogen.

Authors:  W F Marshall; M R Keating; J P Anhalt; J M Steckelberg
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  In vitro activities of antimicrobial combinations against Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia.

Authors:  C D Poulos; S O Matsumura; B M Willey; D E Low; A McGeer
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  27 in total

1.  Stenotrophomonas maltophilia D457R contains a cluster of genes from gram-positive bacteria involved in antibiotic and heavy metal resistance.

Authors:  A Alonso; P Sanchez; J L Martínez
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Interactions among strategies associated with bacterial infection: pathogenicity, epidemicity, and antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  José L Martínez; Fernando Baquero
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Antimicrobial susceptibilities of a worldwide collection of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates tested against tigecycline and agents commonly used for S. maltophilia infections.

Authors:  David J Farrell; Helio S Sader; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Clarithromycin in the Treatment of Legionella pneumophila Pneumonia Associated with Multiorgan Failure in a Previously Healthy Patient.

Authors:  L Gallelli; V Gioffrè; G Vero; A Gallelli; F Roccia; S Naty; G Pelaia; A Capano; A Loiacono; G De Sarro; R Maselli
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.859

5.  Can levofloxacin be a useful alternative to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treating Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia?

Authors:  Sun Young Cho; Cheol-In Kang; Jungok Kim; Young Eun Ha; Doo Ryeon Chung; Nam Yong Lee; Kyong Ran Peck; Jae-Hoon Song
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 6.  What Antibiotic Exposures Are Required to Suppress the Emergence of Resistance for Gram-Negative Bacteria? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chandra Datta Sumi; Aaron J Heffernan; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Fekade B Sime
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Emergence of antibiotic-resistant extremophiles (AREs).

Authors:  Prashant Gabani; Dhan Prakash; Om V Singh
Journal:  Extremophiles       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 2.395

Review 8.  Infective endocarditis due to Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia.

Authors:  R G Munter; A M Yinnon; Y Schlesinger; C Hershko
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.267

9.  Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia after living donor liver transplantation: Report of a case.

Authors:  Noboru Harada; Yuji Soejima; Akinobu Taketomi; Tomoharu Yoshizumi; Hideaki Uchiyama; Yoshihiko Maehara
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2008-04-30       Impact factor: 2.549

10.  Whole-genome sequencing identifies emergence of a quinolone resistance mutation in a case of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bacteremia.

Authors:  Theodore R Pak; Deena R Altman; Oliver Attie; Robert Sebra; Camille L Hamula; Martha Lewis; Gintaras Deikus; Leah C Newman; Gang Fang; Jonathan Hand; Gopi Patel; Fran Wallach; Eric E Schadt; Shirish Huprikar; Harm van Bakel; Andrew Kasarskis; Ali Bashir
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-08-31       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.