Literature DB >> 9122386

Solid breast lesions: evaluation with power Doppler US.

S Raza1, J K Baum.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate power Doppler ultrasound (US) in detection of vascularity of solid breast lesions and to correlate patterns of vascular distribution with histopathologic findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six solid breast masses, which were subsequently sampled for biopsy, were studied with gray-scale and power Doppler US. Patterns of vascular distribution were assigned before biopsy.
RESULTS: There were 25 cancers, 38 fibroadenomas, and 23 other benign lesions. Seventeen (68%) cancers had penetrating vessels, four had peripheral vessels, and four had no vessels. Power Doppler US depicted no vessels in 21 fibroadenomas, peripheral vessels in 15, and penetrating vessels in two. Other benign lesions included 11 with no detectable vessels, nine with peripheral vessels, two with central vessels, and one with penetrating vessels. By using penetrating vessels to indicate malignancy, sensitivity for power Doppler US was 68%, specificity was 95%, positive predictive value was 85%, and negative predictive value was 88%. Two cancers were found to be malignant with power Doppler US only.
CONCLUSION: The pattern of distribution and morphology of blood vessels in solid breast masses seen at power Doppler US is a potentially important feature to be considered along with other sonographic criteria to predict the likelihood of malignancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9122386     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.203.1.9122386

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  25 in total

1.  Diagnostic efficiency of sestamibi gammagraphy and Doppler sonography in the preoperative assessment of breast lesions.

Authors:  Antonio Piñero; Pedro José Galindo; Julián Illana; Francisco Nicolás; Manuel Reus; María Dolores Hernández; Isidro Durán; Manuel Canteras; Pascual Parrilla
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.405

2.  Additional diagnostic value of shear-wave elastography and color Doppler US for evaluation of breast non-mass lesions detected at B-mode US.

Authors:  Ji Soo Choi; Boo-Kyung Han; Eun Young Ko; Eun Sook Ko; Jung Hee Shin; Ga Ram Kim
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 3.  A review of breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Chandra M Sehgal; Susan P Weinstein; Peter H Arger; Emily F Conant
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  Ultrasonographic elastography of the breast using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: preliminary study.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Sachiko Isobe; Miki Yamaguchi; Yukari Ogawa; Kanako Homma; Masahiro Saito; Chanwoong Joo; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-07-24       Impact factor: 2.374

5.  Ultrasonographic tissue quantification of the breast using acoustic radiation force impulse technology: phantom study and clinical application.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Masahiro Saito; Chanwoong Joo; Miki Yamaguchi; Sachiko Isobe; Yukari Ogawa; Kanako Homma; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-09-17       Impact factor: 2.374

6.  Evaluation of solid breast lesions with power Doppler: value of penetrating vessels as a predictor of malignancy.

Authors:  Rositaa Ibrahim; Kartini Rahmat; Farhana Fadzli; Faizatul Izza Rozalli; Caroline Judy Westerhout; Kasumawati Alli; Anushya Vijayananthan; Fatimah Moosa
Journal:  Singapore Med J       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.858

7.  Category assessment based on 3D volume data acquired by automated breast ultrasonography.

Authors:  Mitsuhiro Tozaki; Eisuke Fukuma
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 2.374

8.  Characterizing Breast Lesions Using Quantitative Parametric 3D Subharmonic Imaging: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Anush Sridharan; John R Eisenbrey; Maria Stanczak; Priscilla Machado; Daniel A Merton; Annina Wilkes; Alexander Sevrukov; Haydee Ojeda-Fournier; Robert F Mattrey; Kirk Wallace; Flemming Forsberg
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.173

9.  Superb microvascular imaging in diagnosis of breast lesions: a comparative study with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic microvascular imaging.

Authors:  Xiao-Yun Xiao; Xin Chen; Xiao-Feng Guan; Huan Wu; Wei Qin; Bao-Ming Luo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  Modern breast cancer detection: a technological review.

Authors:  Adam B Nover; Shami Jagtap; Waqas Anjum; Hakki Yegingil; Wan Y Shih; Wei-Heng Shih; Ari D Brooks
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2009-12-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.