PURPOSE: To determine the frequency, distribution, size, and cause of enlarged abdominal lymph nodes in patients with end-stage cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans from 507 hepatic transplantation patients with end-stage cirrhosis were reviewed for the presence, size, and location of enlarged (short-axis diameter > 1 cm) abdominal lymph nodes. Enlarged lymph nodes were identified and resected at surgery. Resected livers were evaluated for malignant neoplasms. CT findings were correlated with histopathologic results. RESULTS: Enlarged abdominal lymph nodes were detected with CT in 253 (50%) of the patients. The enlarged nodes were 1.1 x 1.1 to 3.0 x 4.5 cm in size and were most common in the portacaval space and porta hepatis. The frequency of enlarged nodes varied according to type of cirrhosis: They were most common in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (86% [43 of 50]) and least common in patients with alcohol-induced cirrhosis (37% [42 of 113]). Histologic evaluation revealed that the enlarged lymph nodes were due to benign nodal hyperplasia in 251 patients and malignant neoplasm in two patients. CONCLUSION: Enlarged abdominal lymph nodes are common in patients with all forms of end-stage cirrhosis. In the absence of other evidence of malignancy, enlarged nodes in these patients should be considered a benign process, with no additional evaluation warranted.
PURPOSE: To determine the frequency, distribution, size, and cause of enlarged abdominal lymph nodes in patients with end-stage cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative computed tomographic (CT) scans from 507 hepatic transplantation patients with end-stage cirrhosis were reviewed for the presence, size, and location of enlarged (short-axis diameter > 1 cm) abdominal lymph nodes. Enlarged lymph nodes were identified and resected at surgery. Resected livers were evaluated for malignant neoplasms. CT findings were correlated with histopathologic results. RESULTS:Enlarged abdominal lymph nodes were detected with CT in 253 (50%) of the patients. The enlarged nodes were 1.1 x 1.1 to 3.0 x 4.5 cm in size and were most common in the portacaval space and porta hepatis. The frequency of enlarged nodes varied according to type of cirrhosis: They were most common in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis (86% [43 of 50]) and least common in patients with alcohol-induced cirrhosis (37% [42 of 113]). Histologic evaluation revealed that the enlarged lymph nodes were due to benign nodal hyperplasia in 251 patients and malignant neoplasm in two patients. CONCLUSION:Enlarged abdominal lymph nodes are common in patients with all forms of end-stage cirrhosis. In the absence of other evidence of malignancy, enlarged nodes in these patients should be considered a benign process, with no additional evaluation warranted.
Authors: Alexander Keedy; Antonio C Westphalen; Aliya Qayyum; Rizwan Aslam; Alexander V Rybkin; Mei-Hsiu Chen; Fergus V Coakley Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 2008 Mar-Apr Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Jelena Djokić Kovač; Rada Ješić; Dejana Stanisavljević; Bojan Kovač; Bojan Banko; Petar Seferović; Ružica Maksimović Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2011-10-12 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Ji Eun Lee; Jae Young Jang; Soung Won Jeong; Sae Hwan Lee; Sang Gyune Kim; Sang-Woo Cha; Young Seok Kim; Young Deok Cho; Hong Soo Kim; Boo Sung Kim; So Young Jin; Deuk Lin Choi Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Seanthan Senthilnathan; Khairuddin Memon; Robert J Lewandowski; Laura Kulik; Mary F Mulcahy; Ahsun Riaz; Frank H Miller; Vahid Yaghmai; Paul Nikolaidis; Edward Wang; Talia Baker; Michael Abecassis; Al B Benson; Reed A Omary; Riad Salem Journal: Hepatology Date: 2012-04-04 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Tim O Hirche; Jan Russler; Barbara Braden; Gudrun Schuessler; Stefan Zeuzem; Till Wehrmann; Hans Seifert; Christoph F Dietrich Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2004-04-15 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: I Che Feng; Szu Jen Wang; Ming Jen Sheu; Lok-Beng Koay; Ching Yih Lin; Chung Han Ho; Chi Shu Sun; Hsing Tao Kuo Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-11-28 Impact factor: 5.742