PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy and interobserver agreement of spiral computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 126 patients who underwent spiral CT at our institution and who had a contemporaneous histopathologic confirmation of cirrhosis (n = 67) or clinical and biochemical evidence of a normal liver (n = 59). Two experienced readers independently recorded the overall likelihood of cirrhosis and the presence or absence of hepatic and extrahepatic findings of cirrhosis and portal hypertension on a 5-point scale from 1 (definitely absent) to 5 (definitely present/severe). RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curve and kappa statistic analyses showed that the overall likelihood of cirrhosis was the most accurate and objective observation, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 for reader 1 and 0.90 for reader 2 and a kappa value of 0.70. Individual findings that were accurate and objective were diaphragmatic surface nodularity (AUC = 0.95 and 0.88 for readers 1 and 2, respectively, kappa = 0.75), global or segmental volume loss (AUC = 0.95 and 0.87 for readers 1 and 2, respectively, kappa = 0.70), and superior diaphragmatic adenopathy (AUC = 0.85 for both readers, kappa = 0.78). Of note, portal vein diameter was not significantly different between normal and cirrhotic patients as measured by either reader (P = 0.54 and 0.65). CONCLUSION: Spiral CT demonstrates high accuracy and interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cirrhosis, suggesting CT may be a supplementary diagnostic test in patients who have contraindications to biopsy or have equivocal biopsy findings.
PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy and interobserver agreement of spiral computed tomography (CT) in the diagnosis of cirrhosis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 126 patients who underwent spiral CT at our institution and who had a contemporaneous histopathologic confirmation of cirrhosis (n = 67) or clinical and biochemical evidence of a normal liver (n = 59). Two experienced readers independently recorded the overall likelihood of cirrhosis and the presence or absence of hepatic and extrahepatic findings of cirrhosis and portal hypertension on a 5-point scale from 1 (definitely absent) to 5 (definitely present/severe). RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curve and kappa statistic analyses showed that the overall likelihood of cirrhosis was the most accurate and objective observation, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.97 for reader 1 and 0.90 for reader 2 and a kappa value of 0.70. Individual findings that were accurate and objective were diaphragmatic surface nodularity (AUC = 0.95 and 0.88 for readers 1 and 2, respectively, kappa = 0.75), global or segmental volume loss (AUC = 0.95 and 0.87 for readers 1 and 2, respectively, kappa = 0.70), and superior diaphragmatic adenopathy (AUC = 0.85 for both readers, kappa = 0.78). Of note, portal vein diameter was not significantly different between normal and cirrhotic patients as measured by either reader (P = 0.54 and 0.65). CONCLUSION: Spiral CT demonstrates high accuracy and interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of cirrhosis, suggesting CT may be a supplementary diagnostic test in patients who have contraindications to biopsy or have equivocal biopsy findings.
Authors: Thomas J Bryce; Benjamin M Yeh; Aliya Qayyum; Preeyacha Pacharn; Nathan M Bass; Ying Lu; Fergus V Coakley Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2003-12 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: J Poniachik; D E Bernstein; K R Reddy; L J Jeffers; M E Coelho-Little; F Civantos; E R Schiff Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 1996-06 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Xiao-Ming Zhang; Donald G Mitchell; Hongyu Shi; George A Holland; Laurence Parker; Steven K Herrine; Denise Pasqualin; Raphael Rubin Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Hannu T Huhdanpaa; Peng Zhang; Venkataramu N Krishnamurthy; Chris Douville; Binu Enchakolody; Chris Chou; Sampathkumar Ethiraj; Stewart Wang; Grace L Su Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 4.056
Authors: Miriam Romero; Suzanne L Palmer; Jeffrey A Kahn; Lauren Ihde; Leah Muhm Lin; Anne Kosco; Ron Shinar; Aslan Ghandforoush; Linda S Chan; Lydia M Petrovic; Linda S Sher; Tse-Ling Fong Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2014-04-02 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Grace C Lo; Cecilia Besa; Michael J King; Martin Kang; Ashley Stueck; Swan Thung; Mathilde Wagner; Andrew D Smith; Bachir Taouli Journal: Eur J Radiol Open Date: 2017-07-21