Literature DB >> 9120523

Methodological approaches to shortening composite measurement scales.

J Coste1, F Guillemin, J Pouchot, J Fermanian.   

Abstract

Composite measurement scales (CMSs) have contributed to improving the measurement of complex medical phenomena such as physical and psychological functioning or health-related quality of life. However, their use in patient care and research is often limited by their length and excessive respondent burden. In such situations, short instruments should be made available. Efforts to develop short instruments have largely focused on shortening existing instruments. To investigate the methodology currently used in the shortening of CMS, we assessed 42 studies reported in medical, psychological, and educational journals between 1984 and 1994. A number of methodological and statistical considerations important in the CMS shortening procedure were found to have been ignored or neglected by authors developing short forms from existing CMS. Serious flaws appear mainly to result from inadequate conceptualization of the shortening process, and inappropriate use and excess credit given to statistical techniques used to select items to be retained in short forms. When performed, the assessment of measurement properties of the short form was often inappropriate, and cross validation studies were seldom conducted. We propose recommendations for shortening existing CMS, to help authors and investigators develop and choose, respectively, shortened measurement instruments. These recommendations address the preliminary choice of the original CMS to be shortened, and the two successive phases to be considered in the development of short forms: the shortening process itself, where items are selected, and the validation of the shortened CMS, which should be conducted independently using independent subject samples.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9120523     DOI: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00363-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol        ISSN: 0895-4356            Impact factor:   6.437


  54 in total

1.  Development of the Short Form Endometriosis Health Profile Questionnaire: the EHP-5.

Authors:  Georgina Jones; Crispin Jenkinson; Stephen Kennedy
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Development of the Brief Wisconsin Inventory of Smoking Dependence Motives.

Authors:  Stevens S Smith; Megan E Piper; Daniel M Bolt; Michael C Fiore; David W Wetter; Paul M Cinciripini; Timothy B Baker
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 4.244

3.  Using patients' and rheumatologists' opinions to specify a short form of the WOMAC function subscale.

Authors:  F Tubach; G Baron; B Falissard; I Logeart; M Dougados; N Bellamy; P Ravaud
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  The feasibility, reliability and validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cardiff Short Form (MQOL-CSF) in palliative care population.

Authors:  Pei Lin Lua; Sam Salek; Ilora Finlay; Chris Lloyd-Richards
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Reliability and validity testing for the Child Oral Health Impact Profile-Reduced (COHIP-SF 19).

Authors:  Hillary L Broder; Maureen Wilson-Genderson; Lacey Sischo
Journal:  J Public Health Dent       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 1.821

6.  Development and validation of the Short-Form Survivor Unmet Needs Survey (SF-SUNS).

Authors:  H Sharon Campbell; Alix E Hall; Rob W Sanson-Fisher; Daniel Barker; Donna Turner; Jill Taylor-Brown
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-11-29       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function.

Authors:  C Philip Gabel; Michael Yelland; Markus Melloh; Brendan Burkett
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  Use of Rasch methodology to develop a short version of the health related quality of life for eating disorders questionnaire: a prospective study.

Authors:  Carlota Las Hayas; Jose M Quintana; Jesús A Padierna; Amaia Bilbao; Pedro Muñoz
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.186

9.  Reliability, construct and criterion validity of the KIDSCREEN-10 score: a short measure for children and adolescents' well-being and health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Ulrike Ravens-Sieberer; Michael Erhart; Luis Rajmil; Michael Herdman; Pascal Auquier; Jeanet Bruil; Mick Power; Wolfgang Duer; Thomas Abel; Ladislav Czemy; Joanna Mazur; Agnes Czimbalmos; Yannis Tountas; Curt Hagquist; Jean Kilroe
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ11-14) - short forms.

Authors:  Cíntia S Torres; Saul M Paiva; Miriam P Vale; Isabela A Pordeus; Maria L Ramos-Jorge; Ana C Oliveira; Paul J Allison
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2009-05-17       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.