Literature DB >> 16119179

The feasibility, reliability and validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cardiff Short Form (MQOL-CSF) in palliative care population.

Pei Lin Lua1, Sam Salek, Ilora Finlay, Chris Lloyd-Richards.   

Abstract

In terminally-ill patients, effective measurement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) needs to be done while imposing minimal burden. In an attempt to ensure that routine HRQoL assessment is simple but capable of eliciting adequate information, the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire-Cardiff Short Form (MQOL-CSF: 8 items) was developed from its original version, the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire (MQOL: 17 items). Psychometric properties of the MQOL-CSF were then tested in palliative care patients consisting of 55 out-patients, 48 hospice patients and 86 in-patients: The MQOL-CSF had little respondent burden (mean completion time = 3.3 min) and was evaluated as 'very clear' or 'clear' (98.2%), comprehensive (74.5%) and acceptable (96.4%). The internal consistency reliability was moderate to high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.462-0.858) and test-retest reliability (Spearman's r(s)) ranged from 0.512-0.861. Correlation was moderate to strong (0.478-0.725) between items in the short form and their analogous domains in the MQOL. Most MQOL-CSF items showed strong associations with their own domain (r(s) > or = 0.40). Scores from MQOL-CSF significantly differentiated between patients with differing haemoglobin levels (p < 0.05). Construct validity was overall supported by principal component analysis. It is concluded that the MQOL-CSF is a feasible tool with favourable psychometric properties for routine HRQoL assessment in the palliative care population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16119179     DOI: 10.1007/s11136-005-2817-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN: 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


  43 in total

1.  Cross-cultural validation of the McGill Quality of Life questionnaire in Hong Kong Chinese.

Authors:  R S Lo; J Woo; K C Zhoc; C Y Li; W Yeo; P Johnson; Y Mak; J Lee
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 4.762

2.  Establishing the minimal number of items for a responsive, valid, health-related quality of life instrument.

Authors:  L A Moran; G H Guyatt; G R Norman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Quality of life assessment in advanced cancer.

Authors:  S Donnelly; D Walsh
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 4.762

4.  Validity of the McGill Quality of Life Questionnaire in the palliative care setting: a multi-centre Canadian study demonstrating the importance of the existential domain.

Authors:  S R Cohen; B M Mount; E Bruera; M Provost; J Rowe; K Tong
Journal:  Palliat Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 4.762

5.  Methodological approaches to shortening composite measurement scales.

Authors:  J Coste; F Guillemin; J Pouchot; J Fermanian
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1997-03       Impact factor: 6.437

6.  The quality of life in cancer patients: a cognitive approach.

Authors:  G Secchi; M G. Strepparava
Journal:  Eur J Intern Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.487

7.  Quality of life assessment in daily clinical oncology practice: a feasibility study.

Authors:  S B Detmar; N K Aaronson
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 9.162

Review 8.  Measuring health-related quality of life.

Authors:  G H Guyatt; D H Feeny; D L Patrick
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1993-04-15       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 9.  Quality of life assessment in palliative care.

Authors:  I G Finlay; R Dunlop
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 32.976

10.  Measuring quality of life in hospice patients using a newly developed Hospice Quality of Life Index.

Authors:  S C McMillan; M Mahon
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.147

View more
  3 in total

1.  Quality of life improves after palliative placement of percutaneous tunneled drainage catheter for refractory ascites in prospective study of patients with end-stage cancer.

Authors:  Piera Cote Robson; Mithat Gonen; Ai Ni; Lynn Brody; Karen T Brown; George Getrajdman; Bridgette Thom; Nancy Kline; Anne Covey
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2019-12

2.  Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of self-administered measurement instruments.

Authors:  Janneke van Roij; Heidi Fransen; Lonneke van de Poll-Franse; Myrte Zijlstra; Natasja Raijmakers
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-02-10       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Quality of Life in Palliative Care.

Authors:  Mellar P Davis; David Hui
Journal:  Expert Rev Qual Life Cancer Care       Date:  2017-11-08
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.