Literature DB >> 9113855

Two models of grammar facilitation in children with language impairments: phase 2.

M E Fey1, P L Cleave, S H Long.   

Abstract

Fey, Cleave, Long and Hughes (1993) demonstrated the effectiveness of two 5-month interventions for preschoolers with problems in expressive grammar. This article reports the results of an additional 5-month intervention phase for 18 of the original participants. Results indicated that although participants improved during Phase 2, improvements generally were not as strong as those noted for Phase 1. Gains were larger and more consistent for children who received the relatively costly clinician-administered approach than for those who received a less expensive parent-administered intervention. The parent intervention was successful in helping parents to use sentence recasts, and especially so for parents of children at relatively early stages of grammatical development, Finally, children who were dismissed after a highly successful treatment Phase 1 generally exhibited no gains over the no-treatment Phase 2.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9113855     DOI: 10.1044/jslhr.4001.05

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  8 in total

1.  Cognitive, environmental, and linguistic predictors of syntax in fragile X syndrome and Down syndrome.

Authors:  Bruno Estigarribia; Gary E Martin; Joanne E Roberts
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-04-03       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  Increasing the odds: applying emergentist theory in language intervention.

Authors:  Gerard H Poll
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.983

3.  Language and Literacy Together: Supporting Grammatical Development in Dual Language Learners With Risk for Language and Learning Difficulties.

Authors:  Lisa M Bedore; Elizabeth D Peña; Christine Fiestas; Mirza J Lugo-Neris
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Within-treatment factors as predictors of outcomes following conversational recasting.

Authors:  Johanna M Hassink; Laurence B Leonard
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 2.408

Review 5.  The efficacy of recasts in language intervention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patricia L Cleave; Stephanie D Becker; Maura K Curran; Amanda J Owen Van Horne; Marc E Fey
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  Feasibility of a Recasting and Auditory Bombardment Treatment With Young Cochlear Implant Users.

Authors:  Danielle Encinas; Elena Plante
Journal:  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 2.983

7.  Grammatical treatment and specific language impairment: neighbourhood density & third person singular -s.

Authors:  Jill R Hoover; Holly L Storkel
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 1.346

8.  Input Subject Diversity Accelerates the Growth of Tense and Agreement: Indirect Benefits From a Parent-Implemented Intervention.

Authors:  Pamela A Hadley; Matthew Rispoli; Janet K Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.