Literature DB >> 9113842

High levels of incorrect use of car seat belts and child restraints in Fife--an important and under-recognised road safety issue.

H Campbell1, S Macdonald, P Richardson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To pilot data collection instruments and to make a preliminary estimate of the level of incorrect use of car seat belts and child restraints in Fife, Scotland.
DESIGN: Cross sectional survey of cars containing adults and children at a number of public sites across Fife in 1995 to assess use of car occupant restraints. Trained road safety officers assessed whether seat restraints were appropriate for the age of the passengers and whether restraints were used correctly. These assessments were based on standards published by the Child Accident Prevention Trust. PARTICIPANTS: The survey gathered data from 596 occupants in 180 cars: 327 adults and 269 children. Ten per cent of drivers who were approached refused to participate. Car occupant restraint was assessed in 180 drivers, 151 front seat passengers, and 265 rear seat passengers. MAIN
RESULTS: Three hundred and sixty one occupants wore seat belts, 68 were restrained by a seat belt and booster cushion, 63 in toddler seats, 25 in two way seats, and 18 in rear facing infant carriers. Ninety seven per cent of drivers, 95% of front seat passengers, and 77% of rear seat passengers were restrained. However, in 98 (52%) vehicles at least one passenger was restrained by a device that was used incorrectly. Seven per cent of adults and 28% of children were secured incorrectly. The commonest errors were loose seat belts and restraint devices not adequately secured to the seat. Rates of incorrect use were highest in child seat restraints, reaching 60% with two way seats and 44% with rear facing infant seats.
CONCLUSIONS: The incorrect use of car occupant restraints is an under-recognised problem, both by health professionals, and the general public. Incorrect use has been shown to reduce the effectiveness of restraints, can itself result in injury, and is likely to be an important factor in child passenger injuries. The correct use of car seat restraints merits greater attention in strategies aiming to reduce road traffic casualties. Areas of intervention that could be considered include raising public awareness of this problem, improving information and instruction given to those who purchase child restraints, and encouraging increased collaboration between manufacturers of cars and child restraints, in considering safety issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9113842      PMCID: PMC1067758          DOI: 10.1136/ip.3.1.17

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  36 in total

1.  AN UNUSUAL INJURY DUE TO THE SEAT BELT.

Authors:  S H TOLINS
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1964-05

2.  Non-fatal injuries sustained by seatbelt wearers: a comparative study.

Authors:  M S Christian
Journal:  Br Med J       Date:  1976-11-27

3.  Seat belt injuries: the need for accuracy in reporting of cases.

Authors:  D F Huelke; R G Snyder
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1975-01

4.  Seat belts and accident prevention.

Authors:  S LINDGREN; E WARG
Journal:  Practitioner       Date:  1962-04

5.  Seat belt fractures of the cervical spine.

Authors:  T K Taylor; S Nade; J H Bannister
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1976-08

6.  Editorial: Compulsory wearing of seat belts in New South Wales, Australia. An evaluation of its effect on vehicle occupant deaths in the first year.

Authors:  M Henderson; R Wood
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  1973-10-27       Impact factor: 7.738

7.  Death and injury to children in cars in Britain.

Authors:  J G Avery; H R Hayes
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1985-08-24

8.  Seat-belt aorta: isolated abdominal aortic injury following blunt trauma.

Authors:  C A Clyne; E A Ashbrooke
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  Isolated pancreatic damage following seat belt injury.

Authors:  C P Freeman
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.586

10.  Child restraint laws: an analysis of gaps in coverage.

Authors:  S P Teret; A S Jones; A F Williams; J K Wells
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  8 in total

1.  Cochrane Library feedback.

Authors:  P Chinnock
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  Road traffic accidents - a challenging epidemic.

Authors:  Shirley McIlvenny
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2006-06

3.  Assessing child restraint misuse by parental survey.

Authors:  K B Arbogast; D R Durbin; S D Morris; F K Winston
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.399

4.  Trip characteristics of vehicle crashes involving child passengers.

Authors:  I G Chen; D R Durbin; M R Elliott; M J Kallan; F K Winston
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 5.  Automobile restraints for children: a review for clinicians.

Authors:  Andrew W Howard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2002-10-01       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Misuse of booster seats.

Authors:  S D Morris; K B Arbogast; D R Durbin; F K Winston
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.399

7.  How old is that child? Validating the accuracy of age assignments in observational surveys of vehicle restraint use.

Authors:  S Moeller; L Berger; J G Salvador; D Helitzer
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.399

8.  Transportation of infants and children in motor vehicles.

Authors: 
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.253

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.