Literature DB >> 12226127

How old is that child? Validating the accuracy of age assignments in observational surveys of vehicle restraint use.

S Moeller1, L Berger, J G Salvador, D Helitzer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Many large scale observational studies of child restraint usage require observers to estimate the ages of the vehicle occupants. The accuracy of age assignments were assessed and possible methods to improve observational accuracy in research and field studies of child restraint use were identified.
METHODS: The validation study was performed at fast food restaurants in a metropolitan area. Three, two person teams observed 449 occupants of vehicles with at least one child passenger. The drivers were then interviewed to obtain the actual ages of the vehicle occupants. The primary outcome measure was the per cent of age assignments that were correct by age category (infant, toddler, school age, teen, adult). The observers had previously conducted a statewide child restraint observation study and were trained in estimating age categories.
RESULTS: A total of 391 (87%) of the 449 occupants were assigned to their correct age categories. Incorrect assignments were more common among infants (22% incorrect), but few infants (nine) were observed. The most frequent error was classifying adults (19 years and older) as teenagers (13-18 years).
CONCLUSION: Trained, experienced observers approached 90% accuracy in their assignment of children to specific age categories. Additional study is required to determine whether these results are applicable to different age categories and observers. It is recommended that the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, state and local agencies, and other sponsors of observational surveys consider observer competence as an important variable. The validity of age assignments can be assessed by randomly interviewing a sample of drivers. More accurate age estimates will improve decisions regarding prevention programs, funding, and policies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12226127      PMCID: PMC1730877          DOI: 10.1136/ip.8.3.248

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Inj Prev        ISSN: 1353-8047            Impact factor:   2.399


  27 in total

1.  Buckle up! Is not enough: enhancing protection of the restrained child.

Authors:  F K Winston; D R Durbin
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-06-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Impact of graduated driver licensing restrictions on crashes involving young drivers in New Zealand.

Authors:  D J Begg; S Stephenson; J Alsop; J Langley
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.399

3.  Graduated driver licensing in Michigan: early impact on motor vehicle crashes among 16-year-old drivers.

Authors:  J T Shope; L J Molnar; M R Elliott; P F Waller
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-10-03       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Compliance with the law on car seat-belt use in four cities of Thailand.

Authors:  W Aekplakorn; A Podhipak; M Khumdee; W Sritamanoj; K Youngkao; P Suriyawongpaisal; P Punyaratabundhu; K Narksawat; D Sujirarat; C Phodaeng
Journal:  J Med Assoc Thai       Date:  2000-04

5.  The Tennessee child restraint law in its third year.

Authors:  A F Williams; J K Wells
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-02       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Long-term effects of legislation and local promotion of child restraint use in motor vehicles in Sweden.

Authors:  R Ekman; G Welander; B L Svanström; L Schelp
Journal:  Accid Anal Prev       Date:  2001-11

7.  Where children sit in cars: the impact of Rhode Island's new legislation.

Authors:  M Segui-Gomez; E Wittenberg; R Glass; S Levenson; R Hingson; J D Graham
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Kentucky's graduated driver licensing program for young drivers: barriers to effective local implementation.

Authors:  L C Steenbergen; P S Kidd; S Pollack; C McCoy; J G Pigman; K R Agent
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 2.399

9.  How children travel in cars in New Zealand.

Authors:  D C Geddis
Journal:  N Z Med J       Date:  1982-10-27

10.  Evaluation of the Rhode Island child restraint law.

Authors:  A F Williams; J K Wells
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1981-07       Impact factor: 9.308

View more
  2 in total

1.  Prevalence of helmet use among motorcycle riders in Vietnam.

Authors:  D V Hung; M R Stevenson; R Q Ivers
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  Child restraint use in motor vehicles in Shanghai, China: a multiround cross-sectional observational study.

Authors:  Ting Chen; Abdul M Bachani; Qingfeng Li
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.692

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.