Literature DB >> 9112706

Low back pain. A primary care challenge.

R A Deyo1, W R Phillips.   

Abstract

Back pain is an important problem for primary care physicians; it is common, costly, and controversial. Back pain is the second leading symptom prompting all physician visits in the United States. There are wide geographic variations in medical care for this problem, and surgical rates in the United States are twice those of most developed countries. The treatment of back pain has followed a series of fads and fashions, and work disability resulting from back pain continues to rise. For all these reasons, primary care clinicians have an important role in improving the care of patients with low back pain. Primary care clinicians face unique problems in treating these patients. First, in primary care, most patients have uncomplicated low back pain, and identifying the rare patient with an underlying malignancy or neurologic deficit is like looking for a needle in a haystack. Second, these practitioners face two populations with nonspecific back pain: one that is likely to improve no matter what (who mostly need reassurance), and a smaller group (about 20%) who are prone to development of chronic back pain and who present complex psychosocial and occupational problems. Third, these problems must be dealt with in the typical setting of a 15-minute patient visit. Finally, lifestyle changes in exercise, weight loss, and smoking cessation may be major parts of patient treatment, and improving compliance with such interventions always is a major challenge. Primary care investigators studying back pain face at least three important challenges. One is to identify more efficient diagnostic strategies that will alleviate doctors' and patients' anxieties. Second is to develop a better theory to explain the large majority of episodes of nonspecific low back pain. At present, competing theories generate competing and conflicting treatments, generating frustration among patients and loss of credibility for clinicians. Third, we need better science, with greater methodologic rigor in the evaluation of the many nonsurgical treatments used for back pain in the primary care setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 9112706     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199612150-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  39 in total

1.  Population based intervention to change back pain beliefs and disability: three part evaluation.

Authors:  R Buchbinder; D Jolley; M Wyatt
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-06-23

2.  Chiropractic treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Kent Stuber; Sandy Sajko; Kevyn Kristmanson
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2009-06

3.  A randomized clinical trial and subgroup analysis to compare flexion-distraction with active exercise for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Maruti Ram Gudavalli; Jerrilyn A Cambron; Marion McGregor; James Jedlicka; Michael Keenum; Alexander J Ghanayem; Avinash G Patwardhan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Complementary and alternative medicine practitioners and Accountable Care Organizations: the train is leaving the station.

Authors:  Matthew A Davis; James M Whedon; William B Weeks
Journal:  J Altern Complement Med       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 2.579

5.  Who will have Sustainable Employment After a Back Injury? The Development of a Clinical Prediction Model in a Cohort of Injured Workers.

Authors:  Heather M Shearer; Pierre Côté; Eleanor Boyle; Jill A Hayden; John Frank; William G Johnson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2017-09

6.  TNF is required for the induction but not the maintenance of compression-induced BME signals in murine tail vertebrae: limitations of anti-TNF therapy for degenerative disc disease.

Authors:  M Owen Papuga; Edmund Kwok; Zhigang You; Paul T Rubery; Paul E Dougherty; Gloria Pryhuber; Christopher A Beck; Matthew J Hilton; Hani A Awad; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 3.494

7.  Is chronic non-specific low back pain chronic? Definitions of a problem and problems of a definition.

Authors:  C Cedraschi; J Robert; D Goerg; E Perrin; W Fischer; T L Vischer
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Psychometric properties of the functional rating index in patients with low back pain.

Authors:  John D Childs; Sara R Piva
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 9.  Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care setting.

Authors:  S J Atlas; R A Deyo
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Management of a patient with lumbar segmental instability using a clinical predictor rule.

Authors:  Anna Ribaudo
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-08-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.