Literature DB >> 9112506

Intermediate term assessment of the reliability, function and patient satisfaction with the AMS700 Ultrex penile prosthesis.

F B Holloway1, R N Farah.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The AMS700 Ultrex penile prosthesis is an example of the design changes that penile prostheses have undergone to improve mechanical reliability. Few studies have reviewed an overall experience with the AMS700 Ultrex prosthesis. We review patient outcomes, surgical complications, and Ultrex cylinder intermediate term mechanical reliability and function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between March 1990 and November 1994, 145 patients 32 to 79 years old (mean age 58) underwent insertion of an AMS700 Ultrex penile prosthesis. At a followup of 6 to 62 months (mean 42) patients were evaluated with a retrospective clinical record review, and patient and partner questionnaires.
RESULTS: From the clinical record review of 145 patients our malfunction, reoperation, infection, erosion, major complication and minor complication rates were 8, 13, 2, 3, 13 and 7%, respectively. Patient responses to our questionnaire showed that 85% were satisfied overall, 85% had durable and reliable implant function, 86% had a sustained level of satisfaction with the implant and 83% remained satisfied after a revision for malfunction. Overall, partner satisfaction with the implant was 76%, and 42% reported maintenance of a good or improved nonsexual relationship after prosthesis implantation.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrate the intermediate term mechanical reliability and function of the AMS700 Ultrex penile prosthesis, and high patient and partner satisfaction with this implant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9112506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  9 in total

1.  Nonpharmacologic treatment of erectile dysfunction.

Authors:  Drogo K Montague
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2002

Review 2.  A comparative review of the options for treatment of erectile dysfunction: which treatment for which patient?

Authors:  Konstantinos Hatzimouratidis; Dimitrios G Hatzichristou
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Contemporary patient satisfaction rates for three-piece inflatable penile prostheses.

Authors:  Raymond M Bernal; Gerard D Henry
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2012-07-26

4.  Tubing erosion of an inflatable penile prosthesis long after implantation.

Authors:  Alvaro Morales
Journal:  Sex Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.491

Review 5.  Prevention, identification, and management of post-operative penile implant complications of infection, hematoma, and device malfunction.

Authors:  Timothy K O'Rourke; Alexander Erbella; Yu Zhang; Matthew S Wosnitzer
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-11

Review 6.  Inflatable penile prosthesis in the radical prostatectomy patient: a review.

Authors:  Nelson Bennett; I-Shen Huang
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-06-19

Review 7.  Fundamentals of prosthetic urology.

Authors:  Kole P Akula; Omer A Raheem
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.285

Review 8.  Current status of penile prosthesis implantation.

Authors:  D K Montague; K W Angermeier
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.862

9.  A systematic review of penile prosthesis infection and meta-analysis of diabetes mellitus role.

Authors:  Lucas Mira Gon; Caio César Citatini de Campos; Brunno Raphael Iamashita Voris; Luís Augusto Passeri; Adriano Fregonesi; Cássio Luís Zanettini Riccetto
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 2.264

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.